green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimenez
See United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 567 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimenez
See United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 567 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 340 , 116 L.Ed.2d 280 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Madison v. IBP, Inc.
See Jenkins v. State of Missouri, 931 F.2d 1273, 1277 (8th Cir.) (holding plaintiffs’ entitlement to post-judgment interest on attorney fees accrued from order declaring entitlement to fees) cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 338 , 116 L.Ed.2d 278 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bissell
See United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 568 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 340 , 116 L.Ed.2d 280 (1991); United States v. Sandini, 888 F.2d 300, 305 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1089 , 110 S.Ct. 1831 , 108 L.Ed.2d 959 (1990); United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 563 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 1637 , 104 L.Ed.2d 153 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bissell
See United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 568 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 340 , 116 L.Ed.2d 280 (1991); Sandini, 888 F.2d at 305 ; United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 563 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 1637 , 104.
cited
Cited "see"
Boxall v. Kreb (In Re Boxall)
See Wellman v. Wellman, 933 F.2d 215 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 339 , 116 L.Ed.2d 279 (1991). 7 But the bankruptcy court’s next step is sharply disputed here.
cited
Cited "see"
Telfair v. Gilberg
See Tidmore Oil Co. v. BP Oil Co., 932 F.2d 1384, 1387-88 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 339 , 116 L.Ed.2d 279 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8957 HELLER FINANCIAL, INC v. GRAMMCO COMPUTER SALES, INC. and Donald B. Grammer, d/b/a DBG Leasing
See Vild v. Visconsi, 956 F.2d 560 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 832 , 113 S.Ct. 99 , 121 L.Ed.2d 59 (1992) 16 United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 564-65 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 340 , 116 L.Ed.2d 280 (1991) 17 Id. at 565 (citing H.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Glove, Inc., a New Mexico corporation v. Jacobs
See, e.g., Wellman v. Wellman, 933 F.2d 215 (4th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 (1991) (debtor may not recover avoided property pursuant to § 550 unless it would benefit creditors, not the debtor); In re New Life Adult Medical Day Care Center, Inc., 2014 WL 6851258 , at *6 (Bankr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendoza v. City of Rome
See United States v. Parr, 843 F.2d 1228, 1230 (9th Cir.1988); see also Dempsey v. Town of Brighton, 749 F.Supp. 1215 W.D.N.Y.1990, aff'd without opinion, 940 F.2d 648 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 338 , 116 L.Ed.2d. 278 (1991) (no constitutional violation during investigative stop where police had unholstered guns, handcuffed plaintiff and conducted pat down search for weapons because plaintiff resembled bank robbery suspect and police were reasonable in investigating him); United States v. Lechuga, 925 F.2d 1035, 1039-40 (7th Cir.1991) (police may, in appropriate circumst…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mariani
“The purpose of the bill of particulars is to inform the defendant of the nature of the charges brought against him [so that he may] adequately prepare his defense, to avoid surprise during the trial and to protect him against a second prosecution for an inadequately described offense.” United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 63-64 (3d Cir.1971) (quoting United States v. Tucker, 262 F.Supp. 305, 308 (S.D.N.Y.1966)), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); see also United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 575 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 340 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor Equipment, Inc. v. John Deere Company
See also Tidmore Oil Co. v. BP Oil Co., 932 F.2d 1384, 1391 (11th Cir.) (no breach of the implied covenant where supplier refused to approve a jobber's expansion under a contract stating that the supplier "must approve each outlet"), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 339 , 116 L.Ed.2d 279 (1991). 19 Were the Supreme Court of South Dakota to apply the holdings in these cases to this fact setting, it is clear that Midcon's implied covenant claim would fail as a matter of law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor Equipment, Inc. v. John Deere Co.
(2×)
See also Tidmore Oil Co. v. BP Oil Co., 932 F.2d 1384, 1391 (11th Cir.) (no breach of the implied covenant where supplier refused to approve a jobber’s expansion under a contract stating that the supplier “must approve each outlet”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 925 , 112 S.Ct. 339 , 116 L.Ed.2d 279 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ashley
This Court declines to follow a line of cases holding that Rule 8(a) governs in the atypical situation (present in the case at bar) where “a defendant in a multiple defendant case named in one count seeks to sever other counts in which he alone is charged...." United States v. Biaggi, 705 F.Supp. 852, 858 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (emphasis added) (Motley, J.) (quoting United States v. Clemente, 494 F.Supp. 1310, 1315 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (Sands, J.) (in turn citing United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124, 1158 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 3184 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974))); see also United …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rayful Edmond, III
Although a hearing might be required where the need for juror anonymity is doubtful, here the allegations in the indictment and other submissions to the court adequately justified the use of precautionary measures, and the District Court was not obliged to conduct “a trial within a trial to determine whether the alleged wrongdoing could be proven to have occurred.” Thomas, 757 F.2d at 1365 ; see also United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 574 (3d Cir.) (“A trial court has discretion to permit an anonymous jury without holding an evidentiary hearing on juror safety, if the court believe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
C. C.
v.
P. C.
v.
P. C.
No. 91-353.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1991.
Published
Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.