Michigan v. Mason, 503 U.S. 914 (1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Michigan v. Mason, 503 U.S. 914 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State in Interest of WBJ (utahctapp, 1998-10-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State in Interest of WBJ (2×)
Utah Ct. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sampson, 808 P.2d 1100, 1111 (Utah Ct. App.1990), cert. denied, 817 P.2d 327 (Utah 1991), and cert. denied, 503 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1282 , 117 L.Ed.2d 507 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Streeter (2×)
Utah Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sampson, 808 P.2d 1100, 1103 (Utah App.1990), ce rt. denied, 817 P.2d 327 (Utah 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1282 -83, 117 L.Ed.2d 507 (1992); see also State v. Gutierrez, 864 P.2d 894, 898 (Utah App.1993) (“Our review of the Miranda issue is non-deferential because this court stands in the same position as the trial court in reviewing the transcript of an interrogation.”).
discussed Cited "see" Treister v. City of Miami
S.D. Fla. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ivy Club v. Edwards, 943 F.2d 270, 277-280 (3d Cir.1991) (“[T]he most important consequence of district court abstention pursuant to Younger rather than [.Railroad Commission of Texas v.] Pullman [Co., 312 U.S. 496 , 61 S.Ct. 643 , 85 L.Ed. 971 ] [ (1941) ] is that although a decision under Younger terminates'the federal litigation ..., abstention under Pullman merely postpones the exercise of federal jurisdiction.), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1282 , 117 L.Ed.2d 507 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n
D. Minnesota · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Comm’n, 535 U.S. 635 , 644 n. 3, 122 S.Ct. 1753 , 152 L.Ed.2d 871 (2002); see also, Narey v. Dean, 32 F.3d 1521, 1525 (11th Cir.1994)(”[T]he Rooker/Feldman doctrine, unlike that of res judicata, applies only to state court decisions, not to state administrative decisions.”), appealed on other grounds, citing Ivy Club v. Edwards, 943 F.2d 270, 284 (3rd Cir.l991)(noting that Rook *764 er/Feldman applies to "state court decisions, as opposed to state administrative decisions.”)[citation omitted], cert. denied sub. nom., Del Tufo v. Ivy Club, 503 U.S. 914 , 112 S.Ct. 1282 , 117 L.Ed.2d 507…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michigan
v.
Mason
No. 91-966.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1992.
503 U.S. 914
Published

Ct. App. Mich. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.