green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
“the antitrust laws were enacted for 'the protection of competition, not competitors.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Psi Repair Services, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.
the antitrust laws were enacted for 'the protection of competition, not competitors.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
(PC) J'Weial v. CDCR
“The Eleventh Amendment’s 6 jurisdictional bar covers suits naming state agencies and departments as defendants and applies 7 whether the relief sought is legal or equitable in nature.” Brooks v. Sulphur Springs Valley Elec. 8 Co-op., 951 F.2d 1050, 1053 (9th Cir. 1991) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 9 (1992). 10 Although plaintiff alleges CDCR and CRWQCB have waived their immunity by receiving 11 federal funding, the mere acceptance of federal funding does not, by itself, cause a waiver of 12 sovereign immunity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert J. Kulick v. Leisure Village Association, Inc.
The “color of law” or “state actor” requirement is “a 14 jurisdictional requisite for a § 1983 action.” West v. Atkins, 487 15 U.S. 42, 46 (1988); see Gritchen v. Collier, 254 F.3d 807, 812 (9th 16 Cir. 2001). “[P]rivate parties” such as Defendant Leisure Village 17 Association, Inc. “are not generally acting under color of state law.” 18 Price v. State of Hawaii, 939 F.2d 702, 707-08 (9th Cir. 1991), cert. 19 denied, 503 U.S. 938 (1992). 20 21 Plaintiff argues that Defendant is a “quasi-government entity” 22 (Plaintiff’s Statement, p. 2).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Dretke
See Hollis v. Davis, 941 F.2d 1471, 1482 (11th Cir. 1991) (“[W]e would have greater confidence in the [result reached by a racially mixed jury], finding much less probability that racial bias had affected it”.), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 (1992); see also Cassell v. Texas, 339 U.S. 282 (1950) (Jackson, J. dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arakaki v. Cayetano
Accord Price v. Hawaii, 939 F.2d 702, 706 (9th Cir.1991) (“although section 5(f) itself does not provide a private right of action, an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is proper”) (“Price PV”), 16 cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1479 , 117 L.Ed.2d 622 (1992); Ulaleo v. Paty, 902 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bollman Hat Company v. Kevin T. Root Dale E. Anstine, P.C. Bollman Hat Company, as Sponsor of the Bollman Hat Company Health and Welfare Benefits Plan
(2×)
See Hamilton v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 78 (3d Cir.1991) (Courts have "no authority to draft the substantive content in [ERISA] plans.") (quoting Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348, 1353 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865 , 106 S.Ct. 183 , 88 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985)), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1479 , 117 L.Ed.2d 622 (1992); Van Orman v. American Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bollman Hat Co v. Root
See Hamilton v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 78 (3d Cir. 1991) (Courts have "no authority to draft the substantive content in [ERISA] plans.") (quoting Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348, 1353 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 865 (1985)), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 (1992); Van Orman v. American Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stiltner v. Beretta USA Corp
See Hamilton v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1991) ("Employers are understandably more willing to provide employee benefits when they can reserve the right to decrease or eliminate those benefits."), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A. Corporation
(2×)
See Hamilton v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 79 (3d Cir.1991) ("Employers are understandably more willing to provide employee benefits when they can reserve the right to decrease or eliminate those benefits."), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1479 , 117 L.Ed.2d 622 (1992). 42 Although Congress has determined, by enacting ERISA Sec. 510, that once an employer elects to include certain benefits within its employment package, it cannot revoke them with the intent to deter employees from asserting their rights under ERISA, this policy has no application when the benefits at issue are mer…
cited
Cited "see"
Tricom, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.
Accord HyPoint Technology, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 949 F.2d 874 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1480 , 117 L.Ed.2d 623 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.
See also Hamilton v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 78 (3d Cir.1991) (“While ERISA was enacted to provide security in employee benefits, it protects only those benefits provided in the plan____ ERISA mandates no minimum substantive content for employee welfare benefit plans, and therefore a court has no authority to draft the substantive content of such plans.”) (citation and quotation marks omitted), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1479 , 117 L.Ed.2d 622 (1992); cf. Nachwalter v. Christie, 805 F.2d 956, 960 (11th Cir.1986) (written employee benefit plans governed by ERISA may not…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Solomon v. Liberty County, Fla.
See, e.g., Hollis v. Davis, 941 F.2d 1471, 1474 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1478 , 117 L.Ed.2d 621 (1992); Moore v. Comfed Savings Bank, 908 F.2d 834 , 841 n. 4 (11th Cir.1990), reh’g denied, 917 F.2d 570 . 79 .Thus, any suggestion that racial polarization in the county was somehow caused by partisan politics, as the Fifth Circuit found was the case in LULAC, 999 F.2d at 831, would have no meaning here. 80 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitchell
v.
Mobil Oil Corp.
v.
Mobil Oil Corp.
No. 91-1212.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1992.
503 U.S. 938
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.