green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.2 score
“he unexcused failure to present evidence which is available at the time summary judgment is under consideration constituted a valid basis for denying a motion to reconsider.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Becerra v. Asher
he unexcused failure to present evidence which is available at the time summary judgment is under consideration constituted a valid basis for denying a motion to reconsider.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tait v. Barbknecht & Tait Profit Sharing Plan
See Russ v. International Paper Company, 943 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir.1991) (unexeused failure to present evidence available at the time of summary judgment provides a valid basis for denying motion to reconsider), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 , 112 S.Ct. 1675 , 118 L.Ed.2d 393 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Feliciano v. United States
See United States v. Rivera-Feliciano, 930 F.2d 951 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 , 112 S.Ct. 1676 , 118 L.Ed.2d 394 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trout
See United States v. Kinder, 946 F.2d 362, 367-68 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 , 112 *1280 S.Ct. 1677, 118 L.Ed.2d 394 , and cert. denied, 504 U.S. 946 , 112 S.Ct. 2290 , 119 L.Ed.2d 214 (1992); United States v. Harris, 932 F.2d 1529, 1535-36 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 897 , 917, 112 S.Ct. 270 , 324, 116 L.Ed.2d 223, 265 (1991), and cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1049 , 112 S.Ct. 914 , 116 L.Ed.2d 814 (1992); United States v. Shaw, 920 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 926 , 111 S.Ct. 2038 , 114 L.Ed.2d 122 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jordan v. Fisher
See also Russ v. Int’l Paper Co., 943 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 (1992); F.D.I.C. v. Cage, 810 F.Supp. 745, 747 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Christmas, Jr. v. DG Foods, LLC
See also Russ v. International Paper Co., 943 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 , 112 S.Ct. 1675 , 118 L.Ed.2d 393 (1992); F.D.I.C. v. Cage, 810 F.Supp. 745, 747 (S.D.Miss.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Pham
See also Russ v. International Paper Co., 943 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 , 112 S.Ct. 1675 , 118 L.Ed.2d 393 (1992); F.D.I.C. v. Cage, 810 F.Supp. 745, 747 (S.D.Miss.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hawley
See also United States v. Carey, 943 F.2d 44, 46-47 (11th Cir.1991) (citing several other circuits and holding that a two level increase for obstruction of justice in first case relating to credit card fraud does not constitute punishment for failure to appear and does not bar a later prosecution for failing to appear), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 987 , 112 S.Ct. 1676 , 118 L.Ed.2d 394 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patel
v.
Milgram
v.
Milgram
No. 91-1465.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1992.
503 U.S. 987
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.