green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins
But see United States v. Collins, 957 F.2d 72, 75-77 .(2d Cir.) (inferring, in light of legislative history, that Congress intended “willfully” in 18 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(1)(D) (unlicensed dealing in firearms) to mean merely knowingly and purposefully doing an act that the law forbids), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S.Ct. 2285 , 119 L.Ed.2d 210 (1992); United States v. Peltz, 433 F.2d 48, 54-55 (2d Cir.1970) (under 15 U.S.C. § 78ff(a), a defendant may be convicted of willfully violating a securities regulation *540 of whose existence he is unaware), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 955 , 91 S.Ct. 9…
cited
Cited "see"
Solano v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (St. Johns County)
See McCoy v. Newsome, 953 F.2d 1252, 1264 (11th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Mills v. Singletary
See McCoy v. Newsome, 953 F.2d 1252, 1265 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Mills v. Singletary
See McCoy v. Newsome, 953 F.2d 1252, 1265 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S.Ct. 2283 , 119 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christine Yvette Rodriguez
See United States v. Collins, 957 F.2d 72, 75-76 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S.Ct. 2285 , 119 L.Ed.2d 210 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Snyder
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Caswell v. Ryan, 953 F.2d 853, 863 (3d Cm.), cert. denied., 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S.Ct. 2283 , 119 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992) (concluding that because petitioner procedurally defaulted on claims, “he is now barred from urging these claims in a federal habeas petition, and [the court is] foreclosed from considering the merits”). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Commissioner of Correction
Ed. 2d 360 (2005); see also, e.g., McCoy v. Newsome, 953 F.2d 1252 , 1262–63 (11th Cir.) (‘‘[w]hen a lawyer fails to conduct a substantial investigation into any of his client’s plausible lines of defense, the lawyer has failed to render effective assistance of counsel’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S. Ct. 2283 , 119 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.
"It is the duty of the [defense] lawyer to conduct a prompt investigation of the circumstances of the case **551 and to explore all avenues leading to facts relevant to the merits of the case ...." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Rompilla v. Beard , 545 U.S. 374 , 387, 125 S.Ct. 2456 , 162 L.Ed.2d 360 (2005) ; see also, e.g., McCoy v. Newsome , 953 F.2d 1252 , 1262-63 (11th Cir.) ("[w]hen a lawyer fails to conduct a substantial investigation into any of his client's plausible lines of defense, the lawyer has failed to render effective assistance of counsel" [internal quotation marks omitte…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gattis v. Snyder
A district court is precluded from considering a procedurally barred claim unless the petitioner can demonstrate (1) both “cause for the default and actual prejudice as a result of the alleged violation of federal law[;]” or (2) “that failure to consider the claims will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.” Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 724 , 111 S.Ct. 2546 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640 *368 (1991); see also Caswell v. Ryan, 953 F.2d 853, 860-61 (3d Cir.) cert. denied 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S.Ct. 2283 , 119 L.Ed.2d 208 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Farid Ali
Willfulness is an element of this crime. 18 U.S.C. § 924 (a)(1)(D); see also United States v. Collins, 957 F.2d 72, 74 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 944 , 112 S.Ct. 2285 , 119 L.Ed.2d 210 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Danielson
v.
Roszkowski
v.
Roszkowski
No. 91-7856.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1992.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.