green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.3 score
“laintiffs should be permitted to seek court relief without first presenting the case to an administra 549 tive agency no purpose served by requiring plaintiffs to exhaust administrative procedures.”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gamblian v. City of Parsons
laintiffs should be permitted to seek court relief without first presenting the case to an administra 549 tive agency no purpose served by requiring plaintiffs to exhaust administrative procedures.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Betty Salisbury
(2×)
Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. at 769-770 , 82 S.Ct. at 1050 ; United States v. Sturman, 951 F.2d 1466, 1479 (6th Cir.1992), appeal pending, 60 U.S.L.W. at 3689. 27 This court finds the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion for a bill of particulars. 28 In her third assigned error, defendant challenges the district court's jury instructions on the multiple voting charge as insufficient to inform the jury of the nature of the charge.
discussed
Cited "see"
Village Villa v. Kansas Health Policy Authority
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364 , Syl. 3, 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992); Kaufman v. State Dept. of SRS, 248 Kan. 951, 954 , 811 P.2d 876 (1991) (“Administrative boards and agencies may not rule on constitutional questions; therefore, the issue of the constitutionality of a state statute or an administrative regulation must be raised when the case is appealed to a court of law.”).
cited
Cited "see"
In re the Appeal of National Catastrophe Restoration, Inc.
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364 , Syl. ¶3, 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
CONSUMER LAW ASSOCIATES, LLC v. Stork
(2×)
See Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 422 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992) (an agency’s interpretation of a statute was a necessary administrative act in implementing the statute, even though a court could later construe the statute differently); Farmers Banshares of Abilene, Inc. v. Graves, 250 Kan. 520 , Syl. ¶ 1, 826 P.2d 1363 (1992) (“Interpretation of a statute is *214 a necessary and inherent function of an agency in its administration or application of that statute.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Hamlin v. Kansas Department of Revenue
See Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 427-28 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Rebel v. Kansas Department of Revenue
See Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 427-28 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Friedman v. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts
See Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 421 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992) (interpretation of a statute is a necessary and inherent function of an agency in its administration or application of that statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Friedman v. KAN. STATE BD. OF HEALING ARTS
See Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 421 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2941 , 119 L.Ed.2d 566 (1992) (interpretation of a statute is a necessary and inherent function of an agency in its administration or application of that statute).
cited
Cited "see"
In re the Appeal of Weisgerber
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 368 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert, denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Midwest Crane & Rigging, Inc. v. Kansas Corp. Commission
(2×)
See Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 422 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992) (The interpretation of a statute by an agency was a necessaiy administrative act in implementing the statute, even though a court could later construe the statute at variance with the agency’s interpretation.); Farmers Banshares of Abilene, Inc., 250 Kan. 520 , Syl. ¶ 1 (“Interpretation of statute is a necessary and inherent function of an agency in its administration or application of that statute.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy J. McCall
See United States v. Menteer, 408 F.3d 445, 446-47 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Balanga, 109 F.3d 1299 , 1304 & n.7 (8th Cir. 1997); accord United States v. Bregnard, 951 F.2d 457 , 460 n.3 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Jerome McCall
(2×)
See United States v. Menteer, 408 F.3d 445, 446-47 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Balanga, 109 F.3d 1299 , 1304 & n. 7 (8th Cir.1997); accord United States v. Bregnard, 951 F.2d 457 , 460 n. 3 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Westboro Baptist Church, Inc. v. Patton
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 370 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Appeal of Colorado Interstate Gas Co.
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 370 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. American Airlines, Inc.
See International Resources v. New York Life Ins., 950 F.2d 294, 302-03 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2941 , 119 L.Ed.2d 565 (1992) (applying traditional four factors for granting injunction continuing medical benefits where bulk of plaintiffs claims were governed by ERISA).
cited
Cited "see"
Regency Park, LP v. City of Topeka
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364 , Syl. ¶ 1, 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Huskey v. State
(2×)
See Burke v. State, 1991 OK CR 116 , 820 P.2d 1344 , cert. denied, 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2940 , 119 L.Ed.2d 565 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Copeland v. Robinson
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 370 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Board of Education of Unified School District No. 443 v. Kansas State Board of Education
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Tax Appeal of Alsop Sand Co., Inc.
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364 , Syl. ¶ 3, 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
CITIZENS'UTILITY RATEPAYER BD. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 367 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board v. State Corp. Commission
See Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 367 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joshua Pearson
See United States v. Bregnard, 951 F.2d 457, 459 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2939 , 119 L.Ed.2d 564 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Duckett v. State
See Burke v. State, 820 P.2d 1344, 1348 (Okl.Cr.1991), ce rt. denied, 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2940 , 119 L.Ed.2d 565 (1992) (Lane, J. dissenting). .
cited
Cited "see"
Moon v. White
See International Resources, Inc. v. New York Life Insurance Company, 950 F.2d 294, 301 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 973 , 112 S.Ct. 2941 , 119 L.Ed.2d 565 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Mackin v. City of Boston
See Stuart v. Roache, 951 ___ ______ ______ F.2d 446, 449 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 60 U.S.L.W. 3689 _____ ______ (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jahnke v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
See, e.g., Dean v. State, 250 Kan. 417, 427-28 , 826 P.2d 1372 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992) (so stating); Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 374 , 826 P.2d 1365 (1992) (finding plaintiffs had a clear and certain statutory remedy for full, adequate, and complete relief so the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant such relief, and properly dismissed that part of plaintiffs’ action).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint
App. 2d 379,385-86 , 617 P.2d 107 (1980) (“Exhaustion of administrative remedies is not required when administrative remedies are inadequate.”); see also Zarda v. State, 250 Kan. 364, 369 , 826 P.2d 1365 , cert. denied 504 U.S. 973 (1992) (Plaintiffs should be permitted to seek court relief without first presenting the case to an administrative agency if no purpose would be served by requiring plaintiffs to exhaust administrative procedures.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patricia K. Maher
The background to this section states: 8 Section 4B1.3 implements 28 U.S.C. § 994 (I)(2), which directs the Commission to ensure that the guidelines specify "a substantial term of imprisonment" for a defendant who has committed an offense as part of a pattern of criminal conduct from which [she] derived a substantial part of [her] income. 9 "The object of this section is to distinguish the professional from the amateur criminal and punish the former more heavily." United States v. Taylor, 45 F.3d 1104, 1106 (7th Cir.1995); see also United States v. Rosengard, 949 F.2d 905, 908-09 (7th cir 199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerald Harris
Id. at 2160; 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(2)(B); see also United States v. Bregnard, 951 F.2d 457, 459-60 (1st Cir.1991), petition for cert. filed, 60 U.S.L.W. 3689 (U.S. Mar. 20, 1992) (No. 91-1517); cf. United States v. Doe, 960 F.2d 221, 224-25 (1st Cir.1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bregnard
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-1517.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1992.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Kansas (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.