green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dorn v. ASTRA USA
a defendant is entitled to knowledge of the precise language challenged as defamatory, and the plaintiff therefore is limited to its complaint in defining the scope of the alleged defamation
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dulgarian v. Stone
statements made by a media defendant 'must be provable as false' before there can be defamation liability
cited
Cited "see"
Clarence Daniel Paxton v. State
See Hernandez v. State , 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), cert. denied 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S Ct. 2944, 119 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Clarence Daniel Paxton v. State
See Hernandez v. State , 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), cert. denied 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S Ct. 2944, 119 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Clarence Daniel Paxton v. State
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), cert. denied 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S Ct. 2944, 119 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Ward v. State
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Wheeler
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992); Dillon v. State, 574 S.W.2d 92, 94 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978); Obigbo v. State, 6 S.W.3d 299, 306 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1999, no pet.); Parrish v. State, 950 S.W.2d 720, 722 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1997, no pet.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spookyworld, Inc. v. Town of Berlin (In Re Spookyworld, Inc.)
See Phantom Touring Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724 , 728 n. 6 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2942 , 119 L.Ed.2d 567 (1992); Berard v. Town of Millville, 113 F.Supp.2d 197, 201 (D.Mass.2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Cedillo v. State
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 820 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992); Dillon v. State, 574 S.W.2d 92, 94 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978); Skillern v. State, 890 S.W.2d 849, 880 (Tex.App.—Austin 1994, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonczar v. Suburban Propane, et al.
However, a statement of opinion is not actionable unless it is "sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false." Milkovich, 497 U.S. 23 at 21; accord Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724, 727-28 (1st Cir.),. cert, denied, 504 U.S. 974 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sharif v. Dartmouth Medical School
However, a statement of opinion is not actionable unless it is "sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false." Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 21 ; accord Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 41 953 F.2d 724, 727-28 (1st Cir.),. cert, denied, 504 U.S. 974 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallagher v. Wakefield Sch. Dist.
However, a statement of opinion is not actionable unless it is "sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false." Milkovich, 497 U.S. at 21 ; accord Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724, 727-28 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 504 U.S. 974 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Eastep v. State
See Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 820 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992); Dickinson, 685 S.W.2d at 323 .
cited
Cited "see"
Washington v. Smith
Moldea II, 22 F.3d at 315 ; accord, Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724 , 729 n. 9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2942 , 119 L.Ed.2d 567 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wise v. State
(2×)
Krause v. State, 243 S.W.3d 95, 111 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. ref'd); see also Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re SB
Imminent means "[n]ear at hand; mediate rather than immediate; close rather than touching; impending; on the point of happening; threatening; menacing; perilous." Black's Law Dictionary 750 (6th ed.1990); see Devine v. State, 786 S.W.2d 268, 270 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); In re A.C., 48 S.W.3d 899, 904 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied); Hill v. State, 844 S.W.2d 937, 938 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1992, no pet.); see also Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) ("Intent may be inferred from acts, words and conduct of [the] accused."), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re S.B.
Imminent means “[n]ear at hand; mediate rather than immediate; close rather than touching; impending; on the point of happening; threatening; menacing; perilous.” Black’s Law Dictionaby 750 (6th ed.1990); see Devine v. State, 786 S.W.2d 268, 270 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); In re A.C., 48 S.W.3d 899, 904 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied); Hill v. State, 844 S.W.2d 937, 938 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1992, no pet.); see also Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 810 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (“Intent may be inferred from acts, words and conduct of [the] accused.”), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford v. State
Compare Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d 311, 336-37 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (felony murder was a lesser included offense of capital murder under the facts of that case) with Hernandez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 806, 813-14 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (felony murder was not a lesser included offense of capital murder under the facts of that case), cert, denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2944 , 119 L.Ed.2d 568 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wampler v. Higgins, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2000)
See Stow v. Coville (1994), 96 Ohio App.3d 70 , 644 N.E.2d 673 (citizen's statement to newspaper reporter that city' s manner of handling her tax dispute was "extortion"); Stepien v. Franklin (1988), 39 Ohio App.3d 47 , 528 N.E.2d 1324 (sports radio host's description of a public sports figure as "stupid," "dumb," "Buffoon," "nincompoop," "scum," "a cancer," "an obscenity," "gutless liar," "egomaniac," "suicidal," and "lunatic"); see, also, Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Inc. (C.A.4, 1993), 993 F.2d 1087 (charity charging "hefty markups" on goods shipped to American troops in the Persian Gulf) Phant…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chiara v. Dizoglio
See also Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724, 728 (1st Cir. 1992) cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2942 , 119 L.Ed.2d 567 (1992) (stating that “a defendant is entitled to knowledge of the precise language challenged as defamatory, and the plaintiff therefore is limited to its complaint in defining the scope of the alleged defamation”); Acciavatti v. Professional Services Group, Inc., 982 F.Supp. 69, 77-78 (D.Mass.1997) (dismissing as “factually deficient” defamation claim which alleged that the defendants “caused false and defamatory statements about …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Altech Controls Corp. v. E.I.L. Instruments, Inc.
Furthermore, E.I.L. emphasizes that the three elements of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, i.e., substantial equivalence in function, way, and result, must be proven with “particularized testimony and linking arguments.” Texas Instruments, 90 F.3d 1558 (holding that a patentee must present particularized testimony and linking argument in a doctrine of equivalents issue) (citing and reaffirming Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Sealy Mattress Co., 873 F.2d 1422 (Fed.Cir.1989)) 7 ; see also Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc., 952 F.2d 1320 (Fed.Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 11…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Colodny v. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 19 , 110 S.Ct. 2695, 2706 , 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); see also Phantom Touring, Inc., v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724, 727 (1st Cir.) (deeming the expression “a rip-off, a fraud, a scandal, a snake-oil job” as a “figurative and hyperbolic” commentary of pure opinion), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2942 , 119 L.Ed.2d 567 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
2500 Ss Limited Partnership v. White, No. 328934 (Aug. 19, 1996)
See, e.g., Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724 , CT Page 5674 728 n. 6, cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 2942 , 504 U.S. 974 , 119 L.Ed.2d 567 (1st Cir. 1992); Bobal v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 916 F.2d 759 , cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 404 , 113 L.Ed.2d 459 (2d.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Stallings
Rather, the latter “must plead precisely the statements about which they complain.” Royal Palace Homes, Inc. v. Channel 7, 197 Mich.App. 48 , 495 N.W.2d 392, 396 (1992); see also Phantom Touring, Inc. v. Affiliated Publications, 953 F.2d 724 , 728 n. 6 (1st Cir.) (because defendant is entitled to know precise language challenged, plaintiff is limited to complaint in defining scope of defamation), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 974 , 112 S.Ct. 2942 , 119 L.Ed.2d 567 (1992); cf. Smolla, supra, § 12.05[5], at 12-26.1 (defamation pleading requirements have “a tradition of greater factual detail and…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blankinship
v.
Cinco Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Cinco Enterprises, Inc.
No. 91-1687.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1992.
Ct. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.