green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinnon v. State
See Bowman v. State, 573 N.E.2d 910, 912 (Ind.Ct.App.1991) (holding that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for official misconduct where defendant "submitted false or misleading records of work hours ... with the intent to obtain eurrency"), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2968 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles W. Lindenmeier v. Siemens Power Corp.
See Olson v. General Dynamics Corp., 960 F.2d 1418 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.
The fraud exception “does not apply where ... parol evidence is offered to show a fraudulent promise directly at variance with the terms of the written agreement.” Id. at 796; see also Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. Latian, Inc., 234 Cal.App.3d 973 , 285 Cal.Rptr. 870, 891-92 (1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2967 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992); Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp., 5 Cal.App.4th 1412 , 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 718, 734 (1992); Bank of America Nat Trust & Savings Ass’n v. Pendergrass, 4 Cal.2d 258 , 48 P.2d 659, 661 (1935) (“[T]he rule which permits parol evidence of fraud to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Memorial Estates, Inc., 950 F.2d 1364, 1367 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2969 , 119 L.Ed.2d 589 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Suzanne M. Hanson Peter C. Hanson v. McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc. McCaw Communications of Florida, Inc.
(2×)
Hanson, 881 F.Supp. at 916 & n. 4 ("plaintiffs conceded ... that the written agreement was fully integrated"); see also Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. Latian, Inc., 234 Cal.App.3d 973 , 285 Cal.Rptr. 870, 886 (1991) (an integration clause "may well be conclusive on the issue of integration"), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2967 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr., as Mayor of the District of Columbia
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Memorial Estates, Inc., 950 F.2d 1364, 1367 (7th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2969 , 119 L.Ed.2d 589 (1992). 80 So where does the majority derive the inspiration for its invention?
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Volpert v. Volpert (In Re Volpert)
Matter of Lewis, 920 F.2d 935 , 1990 WL 208777 (7th Cir.1990) (table, unpublished opinion); In Re TCI Ltd., 769 F.2d 441 (7th Cir.1985); see also Matter of Memorial Estates, Inc., 950 F.2d 1364, 1369-70 (7th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2969 , 119 L.Ed.2d 589 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farr v. US West, Inc.
See, e.g., Olson v. General Dynamics Corp., 960 F.2d 1418, 1422-23 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2968 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992) (claim challenging oral misrepresentation regarding the level of benefits provided by a plan is preempted); Davidian v. Southern California Meat Cutters Union, 859 F.2d 134, 135 (9th Cir.1988) (claim against incorrect description of the insurance benefits of an ERISA plan is preempted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farr v. US West, Inc.
See, e.g., Olson v. General Dynamics Corp., 960 F.2d 1418, 1422-23 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 986 , 112 S.Ct. 2968 , 119 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992) (claim challenging oral misrepresentation regarding the level of benefits provided by a plan is preempted); Davidian v. Southern California Meat Cutters Union, 859 F.2d 134, 135 (9th Cir.1988) (claim against incorrect description of the insurance benefits of an ERISA plan is preempted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AIU Insurance Co.
v.
Superintendent, Maine Bureau of Insurance
v.
Superintendent, Maine Bureau of Insurance
No. 91-1563.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1992.
504 U.S. 986
Published
Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Cer-tiorari denied.