green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“court may enjoin a creditor from suing a third party, provided the injunction plays an important part in the debtor's reorganization.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.
court may enjoin a creditor from suing a third party, provided the injunction plays an important part in the debtor's reorganization.
cited
Cited "see"
Gulino v. Board of Education
See In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 960 F.2d 285, 291 (2d Cir.1992), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
See In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 960 F.2d 285, 290 (2d Cir.1992), cert. dismissed sub nom., Hart Holding Co., Inc. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct.. 1070, 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Blech Securities Litigation
See In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 960 F.2d 285, 290 (2d Cir.1992) (noting, with respect to a class of 850 claimants, that the class was “clearly so numerous that joinder is impracticable”), cert, dismissed sub. nom., Hart Holding Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993); Beckerman v. Sands, 364 F.Supp. 1197 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (150 prospective class members satisfied numerosity requirement); Eisenberg, 766 F.2d at 785-86 (“[t]he allegation of more than 90 geographically dispersed plaintiffs met the numerosity requirement of…
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Oxford Health Plans Inc., Securities Litigation
See In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 960 F.2d 285, 291 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., Hart Holding Co., Inc. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chuck Lee Mathenia v. Paul Delo
(2×)
See Bolder v. Armontrout, 983 F.2d 98, 99 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993); Blair v. Armontrout, 976 F.2d 1130, 1134 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 2357 , 124 L.Ed.2d 265 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani
See In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, 960 F.2d 285, 291 (2d Cir. 1992), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hibbard Brown & Co., Inc.
See also, In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, 960 F.2d 285, 292-93 (2d Cir.1992), cert. dismissed 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993) (stating that the obligation of the bankruptcy court is to determine whether a settlement is in the best interest of the estate *46 before it).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rich
If a second petition making the new allegations asserted in the motion would be dismissed as an abuse of the writ, then the motion to remand should be denied.” Smith v. Armontrout, 888 F.2d 530, 540 (8th Cir.1989); see Blair v. Armon *552 trout, 976 F.2d 1130, 1134 (8th Cir.1992) (“The district court did not err in treating the Rule 60(b) motion as the equivalent of a second petition for writ of habeas corpus.”), cert, denied, 508 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 2357 , 124 L.Ed.2d 265 (1993); see also Guinan v. Delo, 5 F.3d 313, 316 (8th Cir.1993) (citing Blair)] Bolder v. Armontrout, 983 F.2d 98, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ackerman
v.
Citibank (Arizona)
v.
Citibank (Arizona)
No. 92-61.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1993.
506 U.S. 1088
Published
Citer courts: D. New Jersey (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.