green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…as a matter of law, absent other relevant factors, a 55 percent market share will not prove the existence of monopoly power.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. LOANCARE, LLC
the rule does not require technical precision in stating the grounds of the motion.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd.
as a matter of law, absent other relevant factors, a 55 percent market share will not prove the existence of monopoly power.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd. John Labatt, Inc. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc. Johanna Dairies Incorporated Robert Facchina Abc Companies, 1 Through X (Fictitious Names of Labatt Affiliates That Actively Participated in the Monopolistic Practices Described Below, but Whose Identities Are Presently Unknown) John Does, 1 Through X (Fictitious Names of Officers And/or Directors of the Corporate Who Actively Participated in the Decision-Making Regarding the Monopolistic Practices Described Below, but Whose Identities Are Presently Unknown) Elmhurst Milk & Cream Company, Inc. Local 584, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio Honeywell Farms, Inc., T/a Elmhurst Dairy. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. Gilbert Levine Mark Greenberg, Third-Party
as a matter of law, absent other relevant factors, a 55 percent market share will not prove the existence of monopoly power.
discussed
Cited "see"
Warr v. Liberatore
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., 980 F.2d 171, 207-210 (3d Cir. 1992) (theme of summation involved attacks on opposing counsel primarily through “vituperative references to opposing counsel”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993); Pappas v. Middle Earth Condo.
discussed
Cited "see"
Warr v. Liberatore
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., 980 F.2d 171, 207-210 (3d Cir. 1992) (theme of summation involved attacks on opposing counsel primarily through “vituperative references to opposing counsel”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993); Pappas v. Middle Earth Condo.
discussed
Cited "see"
Caldwell v. Thaler
See Green, 934 S.W.2d at 105 (citing Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 123 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert, denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993)); see also Harris v. State, 790 S.W.2d 568, 581-82 (Tex.Crim.App.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hogan v. State
See Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 124 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDE
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 190 (3d.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Botosan v. Paul McNally Realty
See United States v. Schneiderman, 968 F.2d 1564, 1568 , cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1283 , 122 L.Ed.2d 676 (1993) (explaining that administrative regulations and interpretations may provide sufficient clarification to save an otherwise vague statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Botosan v. Mcnally Realty
See United States v. Schneiderman, 968 F.2d 1564, 1568 , cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993) (explaining that administrative regulations and interpretations may provide sufficient clarification to save an otherwise vague statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biovail Corp. International v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 212 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); Fuentes v. South Hills Cardiology, 946 F.2d 196, 198 (3d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rankin v. State
(2×)
See Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 125 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Finley v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 207 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); Reed v. Philadelphia, Bethlehem & New England Railroad, 939 F.2d 128, 133 (3d Cir.1991) (“In matters of trial procedure such as that involved here, the trial judge is entrusted with wide discretion because he is in a far better position than we to appraise the effect of the improper argument of counsel.”).
cited
Cited "see"
JEM Marketing v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'n
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 774 F.Supp. 225, 234-35 (D.N.J.1991), rev’d in part, 980 F.2d 171 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 126 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993); Dean v. State, 749 S.W.2d 80, 83 (Tex.Crim.App.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wojcieszek v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 206 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); Alaska Airlines v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536 , 548 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 977 , 112 S.Ct. 1603 , 118 L.Ed.2d 316 (1992); Advanced Health-Care Services v. Giles Memorial Hosp., 846 F.Supp. 488, 496-97 (W.D.Va.1994); Adcom, Inc. v. Nokia Corp., 812 F.Supp. 81, 84 (E.D.La.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Hadnot v. State
See Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 126 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Delaware Health Care, Inc. v. MCD Holding Co.
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, 980 F.2d 171, 198, 204-06 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993). 9 i. Proof of Monopoly Power: Market Definition One element of plaintiffs leveraging claim is proof defendant MCD possessed monopoly power in the “upstream” hospital market.
cited
Cited "see"
Horowitz v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 190 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 *387 S.Ct. 1285, 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); Fireman’s Fund Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anserphone, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
Accord Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 197 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993) (quoting United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 570-71 , 86 S.Ct. 1698, 1703-04 , 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966)).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. State
See Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118 , 125 n. 15 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard Craddock
(2×)
See United States v. Span, 970 F.2d 573, 577 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1283 , 122 L.Ed.2d 676 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. State
Because Texas employs the same standard for legal sufficiency of the evidence as set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, we will address these points together. 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 122 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cer t. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993). 9 By these points of error, Appellant, without citing any authority entitling him to it, seeks review of the legal sufficiency of the evidence from the first trial; he, however, asks that all of the evidence including that wrongfully suppressed by the State be c…
discussed
Cited "see"
David Mears v. Nationwide Mutual
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 206 (3d Cir. 1992) (reviewing a contingent grant of new trial for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993); Larabee v. M M & L Int'l, Inc., 896 F.2d 1112, 1117 (8th Cir. 1990) (affirming the district court's denial of a conditional new trial because it was not an abuse of discretion).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Mears v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
See Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 206 (3d Cir.1992) (reviewing a contingent grant of new trial for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); Larabee v. M M & L Int'l.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hansen
Circuit, habeas corpus standards generally apply to reviewing writs of error coram nobis); accord United States v. Walgren, 885 F.2d 1417, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1284 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993) (“no principled basis for distinction” between habeas corpus and coram nobis proceedings).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRAD EUGENE BRANCH, KEVIN WHITECLIFF, JAIME CASTILLO, RENOS LENNY AVRAAM, PAUL FATTA AND GRAEME LEONARD CRADDOCK
See United States v. Span, 970 F.2d 573, 577 (9th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Echaluse
See, e.g., United States v. Span, 970 F.2d. 573 (9th Cir. 1992) (where after a witness was subject to direct and cross-examination, defense made the court aware of Jencks Act material and the court ordered the material produced), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993), rev’d on other grounds, 75 F.3d 1383 (9th Cir. 1996); United States v. Faulkner, 538 F. 2d 724 (6th Cir. 1976) (where the defense started cross-examination of a witness, then requested Jencks Act material, the judge erred by denying this request, but the error was cured when the Government provided the defense with the required Jen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marcoux v. Farm Service and Supplies, Inc.
See, e.g., Fineman v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 210-11 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); TVT Records v. Island Def Jam Music Group, 257 F.Supp.2d 737, 750 (S.D.N.Y.2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.
See also United States v. Schneiderman, 968 F.2d 1564, 1566 (2d Cir.1992) (“To show a defendant ‘primarily intended’ to sell drug paraphernalia, the government need not show that the items would necessarily be used in connection with illegal drugs, but it must prove that the defendant knew there was a strong probability the items would be so used.”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1283 , 122 L.Ed.2d 676 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirksey v. State
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 ; see also Dawson v. State, 108 Nev. 112, 115 , 825 P.2d 593, 595 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center
See White Bag Co. v. International Paper Co., 579 F.2d 1384, 1387 (4th Cir.1974) (defendant must control at least seventy percent of the relevant market to be subject to monopolization claim); see, e.g., Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 980 F.2d 171, 201-02 (3d Cir.1992) (a plaintiff must show a “significantly larger” market share than 55 percent to establish a prima facie case of monopoly power), ce rt. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miles v. State
(2×)
Rather, the question is whether the State, as beneficiary of the error, can persuade us to a level of confidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the error made no contribution to the affirmative answers to the special issues." Alba v. State, 905 S.W.2d 581, 593 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995) (Clinton, J., dissenting); see also Jones v. State, 833 S.W.2d 118, 127 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 921 , 113 S.Ct. 1285 , 122 L.Ed.2d 678 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Span
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-1172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · D. New Jersey (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.