green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Andersen v. McCotter
But see Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1136 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Dep’t, 607 F.2d 17, 25 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jodelle Kirk v. Schaeffler Group USA
(2×)
Nat’l Stores, Inc., 708 S.W.2d 273, 284 (Mo. App. 1986) (citation omitted); see Radaszewski v. Telecom Corp., 981 F.2d 305, 306 (8th Cir. 1992) (applying Missouri law), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 (1993); see generally United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51, 61-63 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
the Hill and Griffith Company, Adams & Coffey, P.C., and Pamela J. Williams v. Russell Shackleford
See Braden v. South Main Bank , 837 S.W.2d 733, 742 (Tex. App.- Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, writ denied), cert. denied , 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S. Ct. 1337 , 124 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Hill and Griffith Co. v. Bryant
See Braden v. South Main Bank, 837 S.W.2d 733, 742 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, writ denied), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); see also Cap Rock Elec.
cited
Cited "see"
Sebastian International, Inc. v. Russolillo
See Nugget Hydroelectric L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 981 F.2d 429, 437 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2336 , 124 L.Ed.2d 247 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelli Nadine Dalziel and Elizabeth Elleson v. Curtis Jay Dalziel
(2×)
See Braden v. South Main Bank , 837 S.W.2d 733, 738 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ), cert. denied , 508 U.S. 908 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. the Upper Deck Co.
See Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 981 F.2d 429, 437 (9th Cir.1992) (holding that the language “by reason of’ requires plaintiff to allege facts tending to show that they were injured by use or investment of racketeering income), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2336 , 124 L.Ed.2d 247 (1993); see also U.S. Concord v. Harris Graphics, Corp., 757 F.Supp. 1053, 1060 (N.D.Cal.1991) (comparing requirements under §§ 1962(a) and 1962(b)); In re Rexplore, Inc. Securities Litigation, 685 F.Supp. 1132, 1142 (N.D.Cal.1988) (stating “that to hold the payment of f…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mavourneen Doherty v. City of Chicago, Graham C. Grady, Judith C. Rice
See Banks v. NCAA, 977 F.2d 1081 , 1087 n. 8 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2336 , 124 L.Ed.2d 247 (1993); cf. Granberry v. Greer, 481 U.S. 129, 134-35 , 107 S.Ct. 1671, 1675-76 , 95 L.Ed.2d 119 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. School Bd. for Santa Rosa County, Fla.
While there is no protected right to serve as a parent volunteer, the Supreme Court has emphasized that even though a person has no right to a government benefit and it may be denied for any number of reasons, the government “may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected interests—especially, his interest in freedom of speech." Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1135 (9th Cir.1992) (holding "the opportunity to serve as a volunteer constitutes the type of gove…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manufacturers Consolidation v. Rick Rodell
See Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 214-15 (Tenn. 1993) (holding that nonmoving party faced with properly supported motion for summary judgment may not rely upon allegations of his pleadings and, further, that trial judge ruling on motion for summary judgment must view evidence in favor of nonmoving party); see also Radaszewski v. Telecom Corp., 981 F.2d 305, 310 (8th Cir. 1992) (noting similarities between analytical processes applied to motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and motions for summary judgment), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. Rodell
See Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 214-15 (Tenn.1993) (holding that nonmoving party faced with properly supported motion for summary judgment may not rely upon allegations of his pleadings and, further, that trial judge ruling on motion for summary judgment must view evidence in favor of non-moving party); see also Radaszewski v. Telecom Corp., 981 F.2d 305, 310 (8th Cir.1992) (noting similarities between analytical processes applied to motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and motions for summary judgment), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2338 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 668, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 871 Kimberly Rendish v. City of Tacoma Ray C. Corpuz, City Manager for the City of Tacoma, in His Individual Capacity Robin Jenkinson, City Attorney for the City of Tacoma, in Her Individual Capacity John Kouklis, Chief Assistant City Attorney for the City of Tacoma, in His Individual Capacity John Does 1-10, in Their Individual Capacities Jane Does 1-10, in Their Individual Capacities
See 123 F.3d at 1224 -25 (citing Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1690 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 ); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1139 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rendish v. City of Tacoma
See 123 F.3d at 1224 -25 (citing Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684, 1690 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 ); see also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1139 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chateaubriand v. Gaspard
See, e.g., Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1137 (9th Cir.1992) (memorandum exposing abuses, inefficiency, threats to public safety, potential civil rights violations, and incompetence of law enforcement officials, addressed matters of public concern), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Burgess, 918 F.2d at 106 (public employee's speech opposing ordinances believed to conflict with state standards related to matters of public concern). 33 The form and context of Chateaubriand's speech does not detract from its public character.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chateaubriand v. Gaspard
See, e.g., Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1137 (9th Cir.1992) (memorandum exposing abuses, inefficiency, threats to public safety, potential civil rights violations, and incompetence of law enforcement officials, addressed matters of public concern), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Burgess, 918 F.2d at 106 (public employee’s speech opposing ordinances believed to conflict with state standards related to matters of public concern).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard L. Brown v. Disciplinary Committee of the Edgerton Volunteer Fire Department, Edgerton Fire Protection District Commission, Kenneth Crandal
See also Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993) (experience and status that often accompany a volunteer position can make the position a benefit or privi *973 lege which could be taken away unconstitutionally).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Suzik and Roxanne Suzik v. Sea-Land Corporation, Sea-Land Services, Incorporated, and Csx Corporation
See, e.g., Lee v. Chicago Transit Auth., 152 Ill.2d 432 , 178 Ill.Dec. 699, 708-09 , 605 N.E.2d 493, 502-03 (1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 2337 , 124 L.Ed.2d 248 (1993); Jefferson v. City of Chicago, 269 Ill.App.3d 672 , 207 Ill.Dec. 218, 221-22 , 646 N.E.2d 1305, 1308-09 (1 Dist.1995); Smith v. Armor Plus Co., Inc., 248 Ill.App.3d 831 , 187 Ill.Dec. 625, 632 , 617 N.E.2d 1346, 1353 (2 Dist.1993); Laflin v. Estate of Mills, 53 Ill.App.3d 29 , 10 Ill.Dec. 927, 932 , 368 N.E.2d 522, 527 (1 Dist.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nugget Hydroelectric
v.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
v.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
No. 92-1463.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1993.
Cited by 86 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.