green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald A. King
See United States v. Payne, 978 F.2d 1177, 1179 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2441 , 124 L.Ed.2d 659 (1993); Williams, 928 F.2d at 149 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Stahl
(2×)
See FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 537 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993). 11 Frates is particularly illustrative of this distinction.
cited
Cited "see"
Walleri v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle
See FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 537 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3413, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5580 Lisa Walleri and Dan Walleri v. The Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle, a Washington Corporation Michael Cline Ronald Karr Steven Scott Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of the Treasury of the United States United States of America Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Far West Federal Bank, a Savings and Loan Association, Lisa Walleri Dan Walleri v. The Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle, a Washington Corporation James Faulstich v. Office of Thrift Supervision, and United States of America
See FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 537 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3220, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5304 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a Federal Corporation, as Manager of the Fslic Resolution Fund v. Kenneth H. Smith Richard Hoffman Robert Dene Bateman William M. Dalton Jack C. Darley Stanley N. Hammer Robert B. Lorence
See F.D.I.C. v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993). 7 The district court determined that although the Oregon statute of limitations would otherwise have run, the accrual of the causes of action in question was postponed because Oregon would apply the disinterested majority version of the adverse domination doctrine to those claims.
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Smith
See F.D.I.C. v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Blasdell
See FDIC v. McSweeney, 976 F.2d 532, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 950 , 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McSweeney
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings & Loan Assn.
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings & Loan Assn.
No. 92-1417.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1993.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.