green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Rideout
Both communications between jurors and persons associated with the case about matters unrelated to the case, id.; but see United States v. Velasquez-Carbona, 991 F.2d 574, 576 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993) (prejudice not presumed where contact merely constitutes common courtesy to jurors), and unauthorized communications between jurors and others about the case are presumptively prejudicial.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Holmes
See United States v. Amaechi, 991 F.2d 374 , 378 n.1 (7th Cir.) (collecting cases from nine federal circuits holding that “stealing is not a crime of dishonesty for purposes of the Rules of Evidence”), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. G. Mendoza-Tinajero
See United States v. Merritt, 982 F.2d 305, 306 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanders
See United States v. Wilkes, 20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir.1994), citing United States v. Abarca, 985 F.2d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 , 113 S.Ct. 2980 , 125 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norman Wells
See United States v. Abarca, 985 F.2d 1012, 1013-14 (9th Cir.) (plea waiver precludes raising sentencing issues on appeal or through collateral attack), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993). 1 Wells' non-sentencing claims are easily disposed of: 5 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brand
See United States v. Velasquez, 980 F.2d 1275, 1278 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 , 113 S.Ct. 2979 , 125 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993) (upholding same pattern instruction used here); United States v. Hunt, 794 F.2d 1095, 1100-1101 (5th Cir.1986) ("firmly convinced” adequately conveys "beyond a reasonable doubt” standard); United States v. Taylor, 997 F.2d 1551, 1557 (D.C.Cir.1993) (same); see also United States v. Williams, 20 F.3d 125, 131 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed.2d 162 (1994); United States v. Barrera-Gonzales, 952 F.2d 1269, 1272-73 (10th Cir.1992)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mickens
See, e.g., United States v. Velasquez, 980 F.2d 1275, 1278 (9th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 979 , 113 S.Ct. 2979 , 125 L.Ed.2d 677 (1993); United States v. Campbell, 874 F.2d 838, 841 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Hall, 854 F.2d 1036, 1039 (7th Cir.1988); United States v. Kirby, 838 F.2d 189, 191-192 (6th Cir.1988); United States v. Colon, 835 F.2d 27, 31-32 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 980 , 108 S.Ct. 1279 , 99 L.Ed.2d 490 (1988); United States v. Dilg, 700 F.2d 620 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Alonzo, 681 F.2d 997, 1002 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1021 , 103 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Avis Neal
See, e.g., United States v. Velasquez, 980 F.2d 1275, 1278 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 (1993); United States v. Campbell, 874 F.2d 838, 841 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Hall, 854 F.2d 1036, 1039 (7th Cir.1988); United States v. Kirby, 838 F.2d 189, 191-192 (6th Cir.1988); United States v. Colon, 835 F.2d 27, 31-32 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 980 (1988); United States v. Dilg, 700 F.2d 620 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Alonzo, 681 F.2d 997, 1002 (5th Cir.), cert. -4- denied, 459 U.S. 1021 (1982); United States v. Robertson, 588 F.2d 575, 579 (8th Cir.1978), cer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Reginald Henderson
See, e.g., United States v. Velasquez, 980 F.2d 1275, 1278 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 979 , 113 S. Ct. 2979 (1993); United States v. Campbell, 874 F.2d 838, 841 (1st Cir. 1989); United States v. Hall, 854 F.2d 1036, 1039 (7th Cir. 1988); United States v. Kirby, 838 F.2d 189, 191-192 (6th Cir. 1988); United States v. Colon, 835 F.2d 27, 31-32 (2nd Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 980 , 108 S. Ct. 1279 , 99 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jerry J. Latorre v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. Wilkes, 20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir.1994) (concluding that direct-appeal and § 2255 rights are indistinguishable), with Jones v. United States, 167 F.3d 1142, 1145 (7th Cir.1999) (noting that defendant could not waive collateral-attack rights with regard to ineffective assistance of counsel relating to negotiation of waiver) and United States v. Abarca, 985 F.2d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir.) (declining to hold that defendant's waiver may "categorically” foreclose claim to ineffective assistance of counsel or involuntariness), cer t. denied, 508 U.S. 979 , 113 S.Ct. 2980 , 125…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Merritt
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-8639.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1993.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.