green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
“we stress the importance of the district court's obligation under 18 u.s.c. 3553 (c) to 14 explain the reasons supporting the sentence imposed which, among other things, aids this court's 15 review.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bearam
we stress the importance of the district court's obligation under 18 u.s.c. 3553 (c) to 14 explain the reasons supporting the sentence imposed which, among other things, aids this court's 15 review.
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens v. United States
(2×)
See Edmonds v. United States, 609 A.2d 1131 (D.C.1992) (evidence deemed sufficient in circumstances where defendant possessed five small "ziplock" bags of drugs), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2983 , 125 L.Ed.2d 679 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
Id., 1395-96; see United States v. Birdsong, 982 F.2d 481 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S. Ct. 2984 , 125 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miell
United States v. Rogers, 1 F.3d 341 (5th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Young, 981 F.2d 180 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2983 , 125 L.Ed.2d 680 (1993); United States v. Fatico, 579 F.2d 707, 713 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1073 , 100 S.Ct. 1018 , 62 L.Ed.2d 755 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Johnny Carter, Micheal Bearam
(2×)
Id. 1 A. Drug Quantity 46 Sentencing courts are required to "state in open court" their findings regarding the amount of narcotics involved in a drug conspiracy. 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (c) (court shall state the reasons for its imposition of a particular sentence); see also United States v. Maturo, 982 F.2d 57, 62 (2d Cir.1992) (remanding case for additional sentencing proceedings where district court failed to make "specific affirmative factual findings" regarding the amount of narcotics involved), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2982 , 125 L.Ed.2d 679 (1993); United States v. Thorn, 446 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
See, e.g., United States v. Young, 981 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2983 , 125 L.Ed.2d 680 (1993); United States v. Gaitan, 954 F.2d 1005, 1011 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Pearson, 910 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Carter v. State
See also United States v. Birdsong, 982 F.2d 481, 482 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2984 , 125 L.Ed.2d 680 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Fabian
See, e.g., United States v. Maturo, 982 F.2d 57, 62 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2982 (1993); United States v. Feigenbaum, 962 F.2d 230, 232 (2d Cir.1992); United States v. Williamsburg Check Cashing Corp., 905 F.2d 25, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 862 , 111 S.Ct. 169 (1990). 14 Similarly, U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3(a) mandates that "[w]hen any factor important to the sentencing determination is reasonably in dispute, the parties shall be given an adequate opportunity to present information to the court regarding that factor," after which the court shall "resolve disput…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Everett W. Thompson, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Maturo, 982 F.2d 57, 62 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 980 , 113 S.Ct. 2982 , 125 L.Ed.2d 679 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cole
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-8690.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1993.
508 U.S. 980
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.