green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Khan v. Payton
See Ward v. Walsh, 1 F.3d 873 , 877 13 (9th Cir. 1993) (Jewish inmate claiming denial of kosher diet), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1192 14 (1994); McElyea, 833 F.2d at 198 (same); Moorish Science Temple, Inc. v. Smith, 693 F.2d 15 987, 990 (2d Cir. 1982) (Muslim inmate claiming denial of proper religious diet).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bulandr v. Robertson
See Ward v. Walsh, 1 F.3d 873 , 877 13 (9th Cir. 1993) (Jewish inmate claiming denial of kosher diet), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1192 14 (1994); McElyea, 833 F.2d at 198 (same); Moorish Science Temple, Inc. v. Smith, 693 F.2d 15 987, 990 (2d Cir. 1982) (Muslim inmate claiming denial of proper religious diet).
discussed
Cited "see"
Khan v. Payton
See Ward v. Walsh, 1 F.3d 873, 877 (9th Cir. 23 1993) (Jewish inmate claiming denial of kosher diet), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1192 (1994); Moorish Science Temple, Inc. v. Smith, 693 F.2d 987, 990 (2d 24 Cir. 1982) (Muslim inmate claiming denial of proper religious diet). 25 Plaintiff has also stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for the deprivation of food for two days.
discussed
Cited "see"
Khan v. Payton
See Ward v. Walsh, 1 F.3d 873, 877 (9th Cir. 1993) (Jewish inmate claiming 2 denial of kosher diet), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1192 (1994); Moorish Science Temple, Inc. v. 3 Smith, 693 F.2d 987, 990 (2d Cir. 1982) (Muslim inmate claiming denial of proper 4 religious diet).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Tamayo
See Ward v. Walsh, 1 F.3d 873 , 877 14 (9th Cir. 1993) (Jewish inmate claiming denial of kosher diet), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1192 15 (1994); McElyea, 833 F.2d at 198 (same); Moorish Science Temple, Inc. v. Smith, 693 F.2d 16 987, 990 (2d Cir. 1982) (Muslim inmate claiming denial of proper religious diet).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. One 2004 Audi Sedan Automobile
See United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37, 47 (2d Cir. 1993), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1192 , and cert, denied, 511 U.S. 1030 (1994) (heightened pleading standard “an implicit accommodation to the drastic nature of the civil forfeiture remedy”); United States v. Pole No. 3172, Hopkinton, 852 F.2d 636, 638 (1st Cir. 1988) (particularity requirement in Supplemental Rules “is not merely a procedural technicality, but a way of ensuring that the government does not seize and hold, for a substantial period of time, property to which, in reality, it has no legitimate claim”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rouser v. White
See Ward v. Walsh, 1 F.3d 873, 878 (9th Cir.1993) (“In religious matters we take judicial notice of the fact that often the keenest disputes and the most lively intolerance exist among persons of the same general religious belief who, however, are in disagreement as to what that faith requires in particular matters.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1192 , 114 S.Ct. 1297 , 127 L.Ed.2d 649 (1994), after remand, 76 F.3d 390 (9th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. One 2004 Audi Sedan Automobile
See also United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37, 47 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1191 , and cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1192 , and cert, denied, 511 U.S. 1030 (“The complaint does not have to meet the ultimate trial burden of showing probable cause for forfeiture; it simply needs to establish a ‘reasonable belief that the government can show probable cause for forfeiture at trial’ ”); United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1127 (11th Cir. 1996). 6 Further, two Supreme Judicial Court decisions, although not directly on point, are helpful to our analysis.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ward
v.
Walsh
v.
Walsh
93-7548.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 1994.
Published
Ward
v.
Walsh.
No. 93-7548.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 21, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 F. 3d 873.