Harris v. Off. of Disciplinary Couns. of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 510 U.S. 863 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Harris v. Off. of Disciplinary Couns. of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 510 U.S. 863 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fields v. Honda All Lock (alsd, 2021-10-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fields v. Honda All Lock
S.D. Ala. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
The Eleventh Circuit has made clear, however, that a dismissal with prejudice is an extreme sanction that may be properly imposed only when: “’(1) a party engages in a clear pattern of delay or willful contempt (contumacious conduct); and (2) the district court specifically finds that lesser sanctions would not suffice.’” Betty K Agencies Ltd. v. M/V MONADA, 432 F.3d 1333, 1337-38 (11th Cir. 2005) (citations omitted); see Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 987 F.2d 1536, 1542 (11th Cir.) (“Violation of a discovery order caused by simple negligence, misunderstanding, or inability to …
discussed Cited "see" Parrish v. FREIGHTLINER, LLC
M.D. Fla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd,., 987 F.2d 1536, 1544 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 863 , 114 S.Ct. 181 , 126 L.Ed.2d 140 (1993); Cooper v. Southern Co., 390 F.3d 695, 728 (11th Cir.2004).
cited Cited "see" Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1542 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 863 , 114 S.Ct. 181 , 126 L.Ed.2d 140 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.
11th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1542 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 863 , 114 S.Ct. 181 , 126 L.Ed.2d 140 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Chemtall, Inc. v. Citi-Chem, Inc.
S.D. Ga. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
In short, plaintiffs wish to unsheath the “Samurai Sword.” See Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Corp., 148 F.R.D. 362 (S.D.Ga.1991), aff'd, Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co. Ltd., 987 F.2d 1536, 1544 (11th Cir.) (default sanction may be proper for violation of discovery orders even when not preceded by lesser sanctions, where lesser sanctions would not be effective; such default may be entered irrespective of the probable merits of the sanctioned party’s case); see also id. at 1545-46 (district court has inherent power to sanction party or attorney who shows bad faith by hampering enforcement of cour…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
93-67.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 863
Published

510 U.S. 863

Harris
v.
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

No. 93-67.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Pa.

2

Certiorari denied.