green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“ny claims against the crew for failure to adequately respond to emergency would be actionable under admiralty jurisdiction.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Matthews v. Howell
ny claims against the crew for failure to adequately respond to emergency would be actionable under admiralty jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Battoni v. IBEW Local Union No. 102 Employee Pension Plan
See Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp., 4 F.3d 1137 (3d Cir.1993) (finding a restriction could be “tantamount” to a prohibited plan amendment), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1004 , 114 S.Ct. 1369 , 128 L.Ed.2d 46 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Kings County District Attorney's Office
In other words, “it is when execution of a government’s policy or custom, whether made by its lawmakers or by those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent official policy, inflicts the injury that the government as an entity is responsible under § 1983” (Monell v Department of Social Servs. of City of N.Y., 436 US 658, 694 [1978]; see Jackson v Police Dept, of City of N.Y., 192 AD2d 641 [1993], cert denied 511 US 1004 [1994]; Walker v City of New York, 974 F2d 293 [1992], cert denied 507 US 961 , 972 [1993]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curlin v. Regional Transportation District
See Bauman v. Colorado Department of Health, 857 P.2d 499 (Colo.App.1993), cer t. denied, 511 U.S. 1004 , 114 S.Ct. 1369 , 128 L.Ed.2d 46 (1994) (notice that was mailed to the Department of Health rather than the Attorney General did not satisfy § 24-10-109(3)); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Denver School District No. 1, 787 P.2d 206 (Colo.App.1989) (notice given to school district’s risk manager did not comply with the requirements of § 24-10-109(3)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tjontveit v. Den Norske Bank ASA
See Odeco Oil & Gas Co. v. Bonnette, 4 F.3d 401, 404 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1004 , 114 S.Ct. 1370 , 128 L.Ed.2d 47 (1994); Spar, Inc. v. Information Resources, Inc., 956 F.2d 392, 395 (2d Cir.1992); Nationale Co-Operatieve Zuivelverkoopcentrale W.A. v. M/V EFTIHIA, No. 91-2541, 1992 WL 69870 , at *3-4 (E.D.La.
cited
Cited "see"
Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp., 4 F.3d 1137, 1141 (3rd Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1004 , 114 S.Ct. 1369 , 128 L.Ed.2d 46 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kiev v. Glickman
See e.g., Moving Phones Partnership L.P. v. Federal Communications Comm., 998 F.2d 1051 , 1056 (D.C.Cir.1993) cert. denied, Cellswitch v. F.C.C., 511 U.S. 1004 , 114 S.Ct. 1369 , 128 L.Ed.2d 46 (1994); United States v. Duggan, 743 F.2d 59, 76 (2nd Cir.1984); Jean v. Nelson, 727 F.2d 957, 976 (11th Cir.1984) aff'd, 472 U.S. 846 , 105 S.Ct. 2992 , 86 L.Ed.2d 664 (1985); Campos v. FCC, 650 F.2d 890, 894 (7th Cir.1981); Abreu v. Callahan, 971 F.Supp. 799, 815 (S.D.N.Y.1997); Rodriguez v. United States et al., 983 F.Supp. 1445 (S.D.Fla.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hayden
v.
La-Z-Boy Chair Co.
v.
La-Z-Boy Chair Co.
No. 93-1256.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.