green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Jones
(2×)
But see, e.g., Atwater v. State, 626 So.2d 1325 , 1327-28 n. 1 (Fla.1993) (adopting Griffin with approval), cer t. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994); Guiton, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 365 , 847 P.2d at 53 (harmonizing Griffin rule with state law, holding that, on appeal of a conviction by a jury that was presented with alternate legal theories of conviction, one of which is factually inade quate, the appellate court should affirm the judgment unless a review of the entire record affirmatively demonstrates a reasonable probability that the jury in fact found, the defendant gu…
discussed
Cited "but see"
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Ed Begley
But see State v. Bible, 858 P.2d 1152 (Ariz. 1993), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1046 (1994); State v. Carter, 524 N.W.2d 763 (Neb. 1994)(holding such evidence inadmissible). 16 that “[t]he technology for DNA profiling and the methods for estimating frequencies and related statistics have progressed to the point where the reliability and validity of properly collected and analyzed DNA data should not be in doubt.” Id. at 812, n.22 (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Begley
But see State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549 , 858 P.2d 1152 (1993), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994); State v. Carter, 246 Neb. 953 , 524 N.W.2d 763 (1994)(holding such evidence inadmissible). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cook
"It is well established in North Carolina that a murder victim's statements falling within the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule are highly relevant to show the status of the victim's relationship to the defendant." State v. Alston, 341 N.C. 198 , 230, 461 S.E.2d 687 , 704 (1995), cert. denied, [ 516 U.S. 1148 , 116 S.Ct. 1021 ], 134 L.Ed.2d 100 (1996) ; see State v. McHone, 334 N.C. 627 , 637, 435 S.E.2d 296 , 301-02 (1993) (state of mind relevant to show a stormy relationship between the victim and the defendant prior to the murder), cert. denied, [ 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 ]…
cited
Cited "see"
Adkins v. State
Id. at 13 ; see Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re LAS
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
In re L.A.S.
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Aldridge
(2×)
See State v. McHone, 334 N.C. 627, 637 , 435 S.E.2d 296, 302 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 128 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Griggs v. State
See Atwater v. State, 626 So.2d 1325, 1328 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Castillo v. State
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), ce rt. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994); Rodriguez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzales v. State
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See Atwater v. State, 626 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994); Griffin v. State, 474 So.2d 777 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1094 , 106 S.Ct. 869 , 88 L.Ed.2d 908 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
McGarity v. State
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. State
See Atwater v. State, 626 So.2d 1325, 1328 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Steinbach v. State
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert, denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994); Rodriguez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 871, 873 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Railroad Realty Associates
N.J.S.A 13:1K-12; see In re Torwico Electronics, Inc., 8 F.3d 146 , 150 n. 4 (3d Cir., 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1576 , 128 L.Ed 2d 219 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mann
See State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 471-473 (Tenn.1993), ce rt. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Collier Harris
See State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994); State v. Harris, 839 S.W.2d 54, 73 (Tenn. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 954 , 113 S.Ct. 1368 , 122 L.Ed.2d 746 (1993); State v. Baker, 751 S.W.2d 154, 163 (Tenn. Crim.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Virgo
See State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549, 600 , 858 P.2d 1152, 1203 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turro v. State
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), ce rt. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994); Russell v. State, 665 S.W.2d 771, 776 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1073 , 104 S.Ct. 1428 , 79 L.Ed.2d 752 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilder v. State
Affirmed. § 775.0841(a)(2), Fla. Stat. (1995); See Atwater v. State, 626 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1993) cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 ; Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 940 , 83 L.Ed.2d 953 (1985); Manning v. State, 625 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Cartwright v. State, 602 So.2d 641 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Thomas v. State, 494 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Busch v. State, 466 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Cromartie, 419 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), Jefferson v. State, 298 So.2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Manrique v. State
See Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), ce rt. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 222 (1994); Geesa v. State, 820 S.W.2d 154, 161 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Baldenegro
See State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549 , 858 P.2d 1152 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994). d.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thornton
See State v. Schackart, 175 Ariz. 494, 500 , 858 P.2d 639, 645 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Soto-Fong
(2×)
See State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549, 606 , 858 P.2d 1152, 1209 (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Dewayne Henson
Initially we note that “a relevant photograph is not rendered inadmissible merely because it is -6- cumulative.” State v. Morris, 24 S.W.2d 788 , 811 (Tenn. 2000); see also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 (1994) (color photographs of deceased victims at crime scene were not unnecessarily cumulative or prejudicial despite admission of color videotape showing victims‟ bodies as they were found); State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 551 (Tenn. 1992) (photographs of the victim‟s body were admissible despite oral testimony graphically describing t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Reid
(2×)
State v. Carruthers, 35 S.W.3d [516] at 576-57 [ (Tenn.2000)], ce rt. denied, 533 U.S. 953 , 121 S.Ct. 2600 , 150 L.Ed.2d 757 (2001); State v. Banks, 564 S.W.2d 947, 949 (Tenn.1978); see also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adkins v. State
See also Cade v. State, 629 So.2d 38, 42 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994) (holding that `an attorney may reasonably decide to avoid presenting evidence [or a defense] that he believes will do more harm than good')." Jones v. State, 753 So.2d at 1185 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Paul Dennis Reid, Jr.
See also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994) (color photographs of deceased victims at scene of crime were admissible despite introduction of extensive color videotape showing victims’ bodies as they were found).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carter
(2×)
See State v. Morris, 24 S.W.3d 788, 811 (Tenn.2000) (appendix) (stating that “a relevant photograph is not rendered inadmissible merely because it is cumulative”); see also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994) (holding that color photographs of deceased victims at crime scene were admissible despite introduction of extensive color videotape showing victims’ bodies as they were found); State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 551 (Tenn.1992) (concluding that photographs of the victim’s body were admissible despi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Carroll
Moreover, we have also stated that “a victim’s state of mind is relevant if it relates directly to circumstances giving rise to a potential confrontation with the defendant.” State v. McLemore, 343 N.C. 240, 246 , 470 S.E.2d 2, 5 (1996); see also State v. McHone, 334 N.C. 627, 637 , 435 S.E.2d 296, 301-02 (1993) (state of mind relevant to show a stormy relationship between the victim and the defendant prior to the murder), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 128 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. King
Moreover, we have also stated that “a victim’s state of mind is relevant if it relates directly to circumstances giving rise to a potential confrontation with the defendant.” State v. McLemore, 343 N.C. 240, 246 , 470 S.E.2d 2, 5 (1996); see also State v. McHone, 334 N.C. 627, 637 , 435 S.E.2d 296, 301-02 (1993) (state of mind relevant to show a stormy relationship between the victim and the defendant prior to the murder), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 128 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Keen
See also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 , 128 L.Ed.2d 220 (1994) (color photographs of deceased victims at scene of crime were admissible despite introduction of extensive color videotape showing victims’ bodies as they were found).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Keen
See also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 (1994) (color photographs of deceased victims at scene of crime were admissible despite introduction of extensive color videotape showing victims’ bodies as they were found).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. State
See also Cade v. State , 629 So.2d 38 , 42 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994) (holding that "an attorney may reasonably decide to avoid presenting evidence [or a defense] that he believes will do more harm than good").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dill v. State
See also Cade v. State, 629 So.2d 38 , 42 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1579 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994) (holding that "an attorney may reasonably decide to avoid presenting evidence [or a defense] that he believes will do more harm than good").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. David Keen
See also State v. Van Tran, 864 S.W.2d 465, 477 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1577 (1994) (color photographs of deceased victims at scene of crime were admissible despite introduction of extensive color videotape showing victims’ bodies as they were found).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hipps
(2×)
This Court has consistently held that a murder victim's statements that she fears the defendant and fears that the defendant might kill her are statements of the victim's then-existing state of mind and are "`highly relevant to show the status of the victim's relationship to the defendant.'" State v. Crawford, 344 N.C. 65, 76 , 472 S.E.2d 920, 927 (1996) (quoting State v. Alston, 341 N.C. 198, 230 , 461 S.E.2d 687, 704 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1148 , 116 S.Ct. 1021 , 134 *635 L.Ed.2d 100 (1996)); see also State v. McHone, 334 N.C. 627, 636-38 , 435 S.E.2d 296, 301-02 (1993), cert. denied…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Blasioli
Compare Lindsey, 892 P.2d at 291 n. 25, with State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549 , 858 P.2d 1152 , 1189 n. 33 (1993), cert, denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1578 , 128 L.Ed.2d 221 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Am International, Inc. v. Datacard Corporation, Dbs, Inc., Addressograph Farrington, Inc.
(2×)
See also In re Torwico Elecs., Inc., 8 F.3d 146 (3d Cir.1993) (cleanup order entered after bar date was not dischargeable), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 1576 , 128 L.Ed.2d 219 (1994); In re CMC Heartland Partners, 966 F.2d 1143 (7th Cir.1992) (order requiring landowner to clean up contamination ran with the land and was not dischargeable); cf. Ohio v. Kovacs, 469 U.S. 274 , 105 S.Ct. 705 , 83 L.Ed.2d 649 (1985) (order converted into right to payment was discharged in bankruptcy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Copeland
Cauthron (where court relied upon scientific report issued after oral argument); see also State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549 , 858 P.2d 1152 , 1189 n.33 (1993) (new technology, evolving at a pace where general acceptance changes from time of trial to time of appellate review, is at core of what Frye designed to scrutinize), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046 , 114 S. Ct. 1578 (1994); but see Fishback v. People, 851 P.2d 884, 892 (Colo. 1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gosch
v.
Texas Cummings v. California Jefferson v. Zant, Warden Johnson v. Texas Van Tran v. Tennessee McHone v. North Carolina Schackart v. Arizona Bible v. Arizona Villegas Lopez v. Arizona Atwater v. Florida Cade v. Alabama Johnson v. Texas
v.
Texas Cummings v. California Jefferson v. Zant, Warden Johnson v. Texas Van Tran v. Tennessee McHone v. North Carolina Schackart v. Arizona Bible v. Arizona Villegas Lopez v. Arizona Atwater v. Florida Cade v. Alabama Johnson v. Texas
No. 93-6408; No. 93-6937; No. 93-7441; No. 93-7620; No. 93-7635; No. 93-7681; No. 93-7759; No. 93-7958; No. 93-7983; No. 93-7986; No. 93-8009; No. 93-8231.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1994.
Blackmun.
Published
Lead Opinion
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Cal;
Sup. Ct. Ga.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Tenn.;
Sup. Ct. N. C.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
Sup. Ct. Ariz.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Ct. Crim. App. Ala.; and
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
Dissent
Justice Blackmun,
dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty cannot be imposed fairly within the constraints of our Constitution, see my dissent in Callins v. Collins, 510 U. S. 1141, 1143 (1994), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.