green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases ·
“Plea agreements are interpreted and applied in a manner that is sometimes likened to contractual interpretation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gimeno v. NCHMD, Inc.
the elect life feature is part and parcel of the whole group insurance plan and thus erisa governs it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Oruche
plea agreements are interpreted and applied in a manner that is sometimes likened to contractual interpretation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Canady v. Prescott Canyon Estates Homeowners Association
exemptions from the fair housing act are to be construed narrowly, in recognition of the important goal of preventing housing discrimination.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fair Housing Advocates Association, Inc. v. City of Richmond Heights, Ohio, City of Warrensville Heights, Ohio City of Fairview Park, Ohio City of Bedford Heights, Ohio
exemptions from the requirements of a remedial statute-like the fha-are to be construed narrowly to limit exemption eligibility
cited
Cited "see"
Rosario v. M.D. Knowlton Co.
See Snow v. Harnischfeger Corp., 12 F.3d 1154, 1158 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 (1994), citing McDonough v. Marr Scaffolding Co., 412 Mass. 636 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Elizabeth Leary Glenda H. Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Stephen W. Daeschner, Superintendent of the Jefferson County Board of Education, Defendant-Appellee
See Warda v. Commissioner, 15 F.3d 533 , 539 n.6 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Leary v. Daeschner
See Warda v. Commissioner, 15 F.3d 533 , 539 n. 6 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 55 , 130 L.Ed.2d 14 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas v. Crest Asset Management, Inc.
See Massaro v. Mainlands Section 1 & 2 Civic Ass’n, Inc., 3 F.3d 1472 , 1476 n. 6 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 56 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994); Ring v. First Interstate Mortgage, Inc., 984 F.2d 924, 927 (8th Cir.1993); see also Mooney v. Aramco Servs.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dabbs
(2×)
See Massaro v. Mainlands Section 1 & 2 Civic Ass'n, Inc., 3 F.3d 1472, 1477 (11th Cir.1993) (Courts should "construe statutory language to be true to the meaning of the legislation."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 56 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dabbs
See Massaro v. Mainlands Section 1 & 2 Civic Ass’n, Inc., 3 F.3d 1472, 1477 (11th Cir. 1993) (Courts should “construe statutory language to be true to the meaning of the legislation.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
James May v. Shuttle, Inc.
See Nellis v. Air Line Pilots Ass’n, 15 F.3d 50, 51 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 56 , 130 L.Ed.2d 14 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Grigsby
State v. Pride, 528 N.W.2d 862, 867 (Minn.1995) (quoting State v. Elijah, 206 Minn. 619, 624 , 289 N.W. 575, 578 (1940)); see also Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1013 (7th Cir.1994) (Cudahy, J., dissenting) (discussing the similarity between the right to present a defense and the right to confront accusers), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 57 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kemp
(2×)
See, e.g., Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998, 1003 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 57 , 130 L.Ed.2d 15 (1994); Miller v. Keating, 754 F.2d 507 , 509 & n. 1 (3d Cir.1985); Wheeler v. United States, 211 F.2d 19 , 23 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1019 , 74 S.Ct. 876 , 98 L.Ed. 1140 (1954); State v. Gunby, 282 Kan. 39 , 144 P.3d 647, 661-63 (2006); State v. Hafford, 410 A.2d 219, 220-21 (Me.1980); B & K Rentals & Sales Co. v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Co., 324 Md. 147 , 596 A.2d 640, 644-45 (1991); Bynote v. Nat’l Super Mkts., Inc., 891 S.W.2d 117, 121 (Mo.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hickory Specialties, Inc. v. Forest Flavors Int'l, Inc.
Judicial Estoppel Judicial estoppel forbids a party from taking a position “inconsistent with one successfully and unequivocally asserted by the same party in a prior proceeding.” Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 135 F.3d 376, 380 (6th Cir.1998) (quotations and citations omitted); see also Warda v. C.I.R., 15 F.3d 533, 538-39 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 808 , 115 S.Ct. 55 , 130 L.Ed.2d 14 (1994) (taxpayer who inherited land as a result of state court decree adopting her position that will was invalid may not avoid paying tax by claiming in later case that she was not entitled to i…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Pearce
See also the extensive discussion in Stephens v. Miller, 13 F.3d 998 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 808 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Runyon, Postmaster General
v.
Runyon, Postmaster General
No. 93-1696.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
513 U.S. 808
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.