green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jay Tee Spurgeon, Also Known as Tee Tee
But see United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1195-98 (5th Cir.) (analogizing § 2K2.1(b)(5)’s “in connection with” language to § 2Dl.l(b)(l) of the Guidelines which imposes a looser nexus requirement than would 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 856 , 115 S.Ct. 161 , 130 L.Ed.2d 99 (1994).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mendoza
But cf. United States v. Lennick, 18 F.3d 814 , 817 & n. 2 (9th Cir.) (rejecting a jurisdictional challenge based on an invalid indictment under a harmless-error analysis), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 856 , 115 S.Ct. 162 , 130 L.Ed.2d 100 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramirez
See United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190,1199-1200 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 856 , 115 S.Ct. 161 , 130 L.Ed.2d 99 (1994) (holding that a loaded gun in a defendant’s locked desk drawer was within sufficient proximity to drugs elsewhere in the room to satisfy § 2K2.1(b)(5), even though the defendant claimed he was only keeping the gun as collateral).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrell Regans, Also Known as Kevin Price
See United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1195-98 (5th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 856 , 115 S.Ct. 161 , 130 L.Ed.2d 99 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrell Regans
See United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1195-98 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 856 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Young
See United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190 , 1197 n. 19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 856 , 115 S.Ct. 161 , 130 L.Ed.2d 99 (1994) ("[T]he enhancement is required not only for use, but also simply for possession, of a firearm in connection with another felony.”). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erazo
We have held, in construing a similar provision in 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)-which imposes criminal liability for “us[ing] or carrying] a firearm” “during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime” — that the requisite connection with the underlying offense is established if the weapon was used or carried “in order to protect contraband.” United States v. Evans, 888 F.2d 891, 896 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1019 , 110 S.Ct. 1325 , 108 L.Ed.2d 500 (1990); see also United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1199-1200 (5th Cir.1994) (finding that firea…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rogers
v.
Reed-Fleming
v.
Reed-Fleming
No. 93-9620.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
513 U.S. 856
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.