green
Positive treatment
9.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cantu v. Thaler
See Amos v. Scott, 61 F.3d 333, 348 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 1005 , 116 S.Ct. 557 , 133 L.Ed.2d 458 (1995) (“In deciding ineffective assistance claims, a court need not address both prongs of the conjunctive Strickland standard, but may dispose of such a claim based solely on a petitioner’s failure to meet either prong of the test.”) (citing Motley v. Collins, 18 F.3d 1223, 1226 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994)). 23 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rudolph Munn
See State v. S mith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 570 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S. Ct. 417 , 1 30 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. David Ivy
See State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 573 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S. Ct. 417 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Lee Houston
See United States v. Behler, 14 F.3d 1264, 1273 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Lee Houston, Also Known as Pete Houston
See United States v. Behler, 14 F.3d 1264, 1273 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. *881 419, 130 L.Ed.2d 335 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Maurice Lashaun Nash
See State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 570 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S. Ct. 417 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Riley v. Cockrell
See Motley v. Collins, 18 F.3d 1223, 1227-28 , (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles L. Singleton v. Larry Norris
See Singleton v. Endell, 870 S.W.2d 742 (Ark. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Laverne Singleton v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
(2×)
See Singleton v. Endell, 870 S.W.2d 742 (Ark. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994). 7 Singleton filed the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition referred to by the Arkansas Supreme Court in 1993, raising claims of double counting, actual innocence, and Ford incompetency.
cited
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Ricky A. Burks
See State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 570 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S. Ct. 417 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kyle Amsden
See U.S.S.G. 1B1.11(b)(1) and United States v. Behler, 14 F.3d 1264, 1271 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 419 , 130 L.Ed.2d 335 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kyle Amsden
See U.S.S.G. 1B1.11(b)(1) and United States v. Behler, 14 F.3d 1264, 1271 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
George L. Fuller v. Michael Bowersox and Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri
See Bannister v. Armontrout, 4 F.3d 1434, 1442 (8th Cir.1993), *1058 ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994); see also Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 8-9, 11 , 112 S.Ct. 1715 , 118 L.Ed.2d 318 (1992), and Stewart v. Nix, 31 F.3d 741, 743 (8th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
George L. Fuller v. Mike Bowersox
See Bannister v. Armontrout, 4 F.3d 1434, 1442 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994); see also Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 8-9, 11 (1992), and Stewart v. Nix, 31 F.3d 741, 743 (8th Cir. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John D. Behler
See United States v. Behler, 14 F.3d 1264, 1266-68 (8th Cir.) (Behler I), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 419 , 130 L.Ed.2d 335 (1994); see also United States v. Behler, 100 F.3d 632, 634-35 (8th Cir.1996) (Behler II), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 152 , 139 L.Ed.2d 98 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John D. Behler
See United States v. Behler, 14 F.3d 1264, 1266-68 (8th Cir.) (Behler I), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994); see also United States v. Behler, 100 F.3d 632, 634-35 (8th Cir. 1996) (Behler II), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 153 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerome Mallett v. Michael Bowersox, Superintendent of the Potosi Correctional Center
See Snell v. Lockhart, 14 F.3d 1289, 1293 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 419 , 130 L.Ed.2d 334 (1994) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerome Mallett v. Michael Bowersox
See Snell v. Lockhart, 14 F.3d 1289, 1293 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Newman
See United States v. Thomas, 11 F.3d 732, 737 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 419 , 130 L.Ed.2d 334 (1994). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Tokar v. Bowersox
See Bannister v. Armontrout, 4 F.3d 1434, 1441 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mann
See State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 570 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 417 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994); State v. Nakdimen, 735 S.W.2d 799, 802 (Tenn.Crim.App.1987). *529 We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the appellant was not in custody during the initial “alibi statement.” “she initial determination of custody depends on the objective circumstances of the interrogation, not on the subjective views harbored by either the interrogating officers or the person being questioned.” Stansbury . 19 Specifically, the inquiry is �…
cited
Cited "see"
Eric Clemmons v. Paul Delo
See Bannister v. Armontrout, 4 F.3d 1434, 1440 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Eric Clemmons v. Paul Delo
See Bannister v. Armontrout, 4 F.3d 1434, 1440 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boyle v. Johnson
See Snell v. Lockhart, 14 F.3d 1289 , 1299 n. 8 (8th Cir.) (declining to disallow associational evidence under Dawson because "most of the ... evidence in this case was relevant."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 419 , 130 L.Ed.2d 334 (1994); United States v. Robinson, 978 F.2d 1554, 1565 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Dawson to a non-capital trial and allowing admission of associational evidence because the evidence was specific and relevant to the offenses charged), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1034 , 113 S.Ct. 1855 , 123 L.Ed.2d 478 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. State
(2×)
See generally State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 582 (Tenn. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 417 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994); State v. Cauthern, 778 S.W.2d 39, 47 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 904 , 110 S.Ct. 1922 , 109 L.Ed.2d 286 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gordon
Tennessee Law of ‘ Evidence, supra, § 803(2).2 at 534; see also State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 574 (Tenn.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 417 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994). 3 The declarant does not have to be a participant in the startling event or condition, and statements made in response to questions may still be admissible if the declarant *821 is under the excitement or stress of the event.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Anthony Carter v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Strickland v. *1110 Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Motley v. Collins, 18 F.3d 1223, 1226 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 960 , 115 S.Ct. 418 , 130 L.Ed.2d 333 (1994) (summarizing the Washington standard of review).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Tennessee
v.
Tennessee
No. 93-8580.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1994.
513 U.S. 960
Published
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certio-rari denied.