green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.6 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases ·
“An appellee [without cross- appealing] may urge any ground for affirmance supported by the record.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Michael R. O'Rourke v. Roger Endell
an appellee may urge any ground for affirmance supported by the record.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. MO Bd of Probation
See Thompson v. Mo. Bd. of Probation and Parole, 39 F.3d 186 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995). 1 Thompson’s conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal on January 5, 1987.
discussed
Cited "see"
Warner v. State
(2×)
See Howell v. State, 1994 OK CR 62, ¶¶ 5-6 , 882 P.2d 1086, 1089 , cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1968 , 131 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995) (this Court rejected appellant's argument that under Tibbetts juror's deliberate withholding of pertinent information was not consistent with the principles of fundamental fairness).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Thomas
See United States v. Smith, 44 F.3d 1259, 1267-68 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Thomas
See United States v. Smith, 44 F.3d 1259, 1267-68 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Amilpas-Wences
See United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1969 , 131 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Primeaux v. State
(2×)
See Howell v. State, 1994 OK CR 62, ¶ 18 , 882 P.2d 1086, 1091 , cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1968 , 131 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995). ¶ 65 Roberson's "testimony was given under circumstances which closely approximated those of a typical trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas W. Thompson v. Jeremiah W. Nixon
See Thompson v. Missouri Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 39 F.3d 186 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas W. Thompson v. Jeremiah W. Nixon and Page True
See Thompson v. Missouri Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 39 F.3d 186 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clinton Ross, II
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 919 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clinton Earl John Ross, Ii, Also Known as Matthew James McCallister
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 919 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. April D. Lebrun
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. April D. Lebrun
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Curtis McIntosh
(2×)
See United States v. Patterson, 38 F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven McIntosh
See United States v. Patterson, 38 F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Larry Smithson v. Kenneth Brown
See Habiger v. City of Fargo, 80 F.3d 289 , 296 (8th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S. Ct. 1970 , 131 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smithson v. Aldrich
See Habiger v. City of Fargo, 80 F.3d 289 , 296 (8 th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 915 (8 th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S. Ct. 1970 , 131 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smithson v. Aldrich
See Habiger v. City of Fargo, 80 F.3d 289 , 296 (8th Cir.1996) (citing United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 915 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995); Foster v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 914 F.2d 1076, 1081 (8th Cir.1990)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Alexander
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 919 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995); cf. Wyoming v. Houghton, 119 S. Ct. 1297 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America v. $ 404,905.00 in U.S. Currency, Stephen Alexander
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 919 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995); cf. Wyoming v. Houghton, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 1297 , 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark E. Tuley
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 918 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995); United States v. Weaver, 966 F.2d 391, 394 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1040 , 113 S.Ct. 829 , 121 L.Ed.2d 699 (1992); United States v. Jones, 759 F.2d 633, 642-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 837 , 106 S.Ct. 113 , 88 L.Ed.2d 92 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark E. Tuley
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 918 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995); United States v. Weaver, 966 F.2d 391, 394 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1040 (1992); United States v. Jones, 759 F.2d 633, 642-43 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 837 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles M. Raimondi, Jr.
See United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1969 , 131 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995); United States v. Doe, 18 F.3d 41, 45-46 (1st Cir.1994). 21 .See discussion supra Part II.B.l, at 16-17; see also § 1B1.4 & commentary; § 5K2.0, p.s.; § 5K2.6, p.s.; United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 , -, 117 S.Ct. 633, 636 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997); Witte v. United States, 515 U.S. 389, 401 , 115 S.Ct. 2199 , 132 L.Ed.2d 351 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip W. Hammons
(2×)
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (applying the “reasonable view of the evidence” test to the district court’s decision to deny a motion to suppress), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995). 9 To decide whether the cocaine inside the envelope would have been inevitably discovered, this Court must not only examine whether there was a reasonable probability that the evidence would have been discovered by lawful means if the police misconduct had not occurred, but it must also examine whether the government was pursuing a substantial, alternative line o…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip W. Hammons
(2×)
See United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d. 910, 919 (8th Cir.1994) *1030 (en banc) (drug dog’s identification of drugs in luggage provides probable cause that drugs are present), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas Wayne Thompson v. Page True, Warden, U.S.P. Leavenworth
See Thompson v. Missouri Bd. of Probation & Parole, 39 F.3d 186, 189 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. TRUE
See Thompson v. Missouri Bd. of Probation & Parole , 39 F.3d 186, 189 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 514 U.S. 1113 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Wayne Beck
See generally United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 913-14 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Colapinto
See ibid, (quoting United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir.1994) (identifying several factors to aid in the analysis of when an investigative stop becomes a de facto arrest), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995)).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dickey
See [United States v.] Willis, 967 F.2d [1220], 1224 [ (8th Cir.1992) ]. [United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995).] Ill Applying these principles to the circumstances of this case leads us to conclude that the combination of the duration of the detention and the degree of intrusion upon the liberty of the motorists exceeded that measure authorized by Terry and its progeny.
discussed
Cited "see"
Assistance by State and Local Police in Apprehending Illegal Aliens
See United States v. Wilson, 7 F.3d 828, 834 (9th Cir. 1993), cert, denied, 511 U.S. 1134 (1994).5 Moreover, police would be permitted to inquire as to the immigration status of passengers in such a stopped vehicle as long as they do not unnecessarily prolong the length of the 5 See also United States v. Bloomfield, 4 0 F.3d 910 , 918 (8th Cir. 1994), cert, denied, 514 U.S. 1113 (1995), where the court held, “ If, during a traffic stop, an officer develops a reasonable, articulable suspicion that a vehicle is canying contraband, he has ‘justification for a greater intrusion unrelated to th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Datcu
See Minn.Stat. § 609.59 (criminalizing possession of burglary or theft tools); United States v. West, 280 Fed.Appx. 563, 566 (8th Cir.2008) (unpublished per curiam) (SUV passenger’s attempt to flee when police officers arrived contributed to probable cause finding); United States v. Riedesel, 987 F.2d 1383, 1390 (8th Cir.1993) (officer’s observation of the defendant’s car “parked in an unusual location” contributed to finding of probable cause); compare United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910 , 918 n. 9 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Duarte
See, e.g., United States v. Wong, 40 F.3d 1347, 1378 (2d Cir.1994), cert, denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1968 , 131 L.Ed.2d 858 (1995); see also United States v. Diaz, 878 F.2d 608, 614 (2d Cir.1989) (“determinations of relevance are entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be overturned unless he has acted arbitrarily or irrationally” (internal quotation marks omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berroa v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 44 F.3d 1259, 1267-69 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1113 , 115 S.Ct. 1970 , 131 L.Ed.2d 859 (1995) (trial judge did not abuse his discretion by declining to grant a mistrial where a thirty-two day mid-trial continuance had been granted to accommodate the judge’s vacation plans and defendant’s illness); State v. Kanae, 89 Hawai'i 198 , 970 P.2d 506, 510 (1998) (trial judge did not abuse his discretion by denying a motion for a mistrial where jury deliberations had been delayed for seventeen days); but see United States v. Hay, 122 F.3d 1233, 1234 (9th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ngo
v.
United States and Kwok v. United States
v.
United States and Kwok v. United States
No. 94-7974; No. 94-8004.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1995.
514 U.S. 1113
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.