green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EDGAR TORRES(12-09-1539, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
See State v. DiFrisco, 118 16 A-5901-13T4 N.J. 253, 271-72 (1990), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 116 S. Ct. 949 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See State v. Gamer, 340 N.C. 573, 588 , 459 S.E.2d 718, 725 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Merritt v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp.
See State v. DiFrisco, 137 N.J. 434 , 645 A.2d 734 , 753 n. 1 (1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 116 S.Ct. 949 , 133 L.E.d.2d 873 (1996) (citing case law from twenty-two other states, including Indiana, that require the use of peremptories to correct erroneous denials of challenges for cause). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Meyer
See State v. Garner, 340 N.C. 573, 594 , 459 S.E.2d 718, 729 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 133 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilkerson
See State v. DiFrisco, 137 N.J. 434, 457 , 645 A. 2d 734 (1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 116 S.Ct. 949 , 133 L.Ed. 2d 873 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tinnes
While it is true that the loss of a peremptory challenge has never been viewed either in the federal system or in this State as a constitutional deprivation, the right to use peremptory challenges is nevertheless a "substantial right," State v. Singletary, supra, 80 N.J. at 62 , 402 A. 2d 203 ; see also State v. W.A., supra, 184 N.J. at 55-56 , 875 A. 2d 882 , with "historic roots," State v. Brunson, supra, 101 N.J. at 136 , 501 A. 2d 145 . [2] As explained by the Court in State v. DiFrisco, 137 N.J. 434, 468 , 645 A. 2d 734 (1994) (quoting State v. Brunson, supra, 101 N.J. at 137-38 , 501 A. …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
See, e.g., State v. Garner, 340 N.C. 573, 605 , 459 S.E.2d 718, 735 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Proportionality Review Project (II)
(2×)
Last term, after having conducted four proportionality reviews between 1992 and 1995, we evaluated the reliability of the multiple regression models Baldus had devised. 1 Loftin II, supra, 157 N.J. at 308-16 , 724 A.2d 129 ; see also State v. DiFrisco, 142 N.J. 148 , 662 A.2d 442 (1995) (DiFrisco III) (using Baldus-created models for proportionality review), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 116 S.Ct. 949 , 133 L.Ed.2d 873 (1996); State v. Martini, 139 N.J. 3 , 651 A.2d 949 (1994) (Martini II) (same), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 875 , 116 S.Ct. 203 , 133 L.Ed.2d 137 (1995); State v. Bey, 137 N.J. 334 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Covell
Its decisions are entitled to deference and are to be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.” State v. Ramseur, 106 N.J. 123, 266 , 524 A.2d 188 (1987); see also State v. DiFrisco, 137 N.J. 434, 496 , 645 A.2d 734 (1994) (noting that “[w]e accord trial judges broad discretion in applying the balancing test”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 , 116 S.Ct. 949 , 133 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Stenson
State v. Loftin, 146 N.J. 295 , 680 A.2d 677, 713 (1996); see also State v. DiFrisco, 137 N.J. 434 , 645 A.2d 734 (1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1129 (1996) (whether the defendant’s execution would cause excessive emotional hardship to his mother neither related to the defendant’s character or record nor to the circumstances of the offense and rather focused on the potential impact on a third party and was properly excluded).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sweeney
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-7192.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1996.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.