Payne v. Kaplan, 516 U.S. 810 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Payne v. Kaplan, 516 U.S. 810 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: A.D. v. Deere & Co. (nmd, 2004-10-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" A.D. v. Deere & Co.
D.N.M. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mein v. Grynberg, 44 F.3d 1497 , 1506 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 22 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School District
W.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Klein v. Grynberg, 44 F.3d 1497, 1507 (10th Cir.) (“To deny [the prevailing parties] costs would be in the nature of a severe penalty imposed upon them, and there must be some apparent reason to penalize the prevailing party if costs are to be denied”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 22 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Cadle Co. v. Lobingier
Tex. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier, 868 S.W.2d 918 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth), writ denied per curiam, 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 21 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Cadle Co. v. Lobingier
Tex. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier, 868 S.W.2d 918 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth), writ denied per curiam, 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 21 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" Actonet, Ltd. v. Allou Health & Beauty Care, Doing Business as the Fragrance Counter, Inc.
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaSociete Generale Immobiliere v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency, 44 F.3d 629, 635 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 22 (1995); International Union of Operating Engineers Local 571 v. Hawkins Construction Co., 929 F.2d 1346, 1348 (8th Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see" Actonet v. Allou Health &
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaSociete Generale Immobiliere v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency, 44 F.3d 629, 635 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 (1995); International Union of Operating Engineers Local 571 v. Hawkins Construction Co., 929 F.2d 1346 , 1348 (8th Cir.1991).
cited Cited "see" In Re MCI Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation
E.D.N.Y · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kaplan v. Rose, 49 F.3d 1363, 1374 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 21 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Nollmeyer v. United States
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sac & Fox Nation v. Hanson, 47 F.3d 1061, 1063 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 57 , 133 L.Ed.2d 21 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" In re Biogen Securities Litigation
D. Mass. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kaplan v. Rose, 49 F.3d 1363, 1375-80 (9th Cir.1994) (failing to disclose known disappointing trial results while releasing positive statements regarding product was sufficient evidence of scienter to raise genuine issue of material fact on summary judgment), cert. denied sub nom., Payne v. Kaplan, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 21 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mark v. HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP. III (2×)
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 89 S.W.3d 179, 186 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2002, no pet.); see also Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier, 868 S.W.2d 918, 921 (Tex.App.-Forl Worth 1994), writ denied, per curiam on other grounds, 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.) (stating that plaintiff must prove that "plaintiff is the present holder of the note” to recover under the note), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 , 116 S.Ct. 58 , 133 L.Ed.2d 21 (1995). . 169 S.W.3d 402 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, no pet.). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert v. Mark and Dianne L. Mark v. Household Finance Corporation III
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 89 S.W.3d 179, 186 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2002, no pet.); see also Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier, 868 S.W.2d 918, 921 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994), writ denied per curiam on other grounds, 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.) (stating that plaintiff must prove that “plaintiff is the present holder of the note” to recover under the note), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 810 (1995). 3 … 169 S.W.3d 402 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.). 4 … Id. at 410 . 2 and the demand letter from its counsel—that identify it as the legal owner and holder of the note.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert v. Mark and Dianne L. Mark v. Household Finance Corporation III
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp. , 89 S.W.3d 179, 186 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2002, no pet.); see also Cadle Co. v. Bankston & Lobingier , 868 S.W.2d 918, 921 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994), writ denied per curiam on other grounds , 893 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.) (stating that plaintiff must prove that “plaintiff is the present holder of the note” to recover under the note), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 810 (1995). 3: 169 S.W.3d 402 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.). 4: Id. at 410. 5: See id. 6: See Tex. R.
Payne
v.
Kaplan, Administrator of the Estate of Kaplan
No. 94-1895.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
516 U.S. 810
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.