green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.1 score
“the passage of time is less significant when there is cause to suspect continuing criminal activity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Mims
the passage of time is less significant when there is cause to suspect continuing criminal activity.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kattaria
(2×)
See Olson, 21 F.3d at 850 . "[W]here recent information corroborates otherwise stale information, probable cause may be found." United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1446 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 128 (1995) (quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohammed A. Kattaria
See Olson, 21 F.3d at 850 . “[W]here recent information corroborates otherwise stale information, probable cause may be found.” United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1446 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 (1995) (quotation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bolden
(2×)
See United States v. Crouch, 46 F.3d 871, 875 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 129 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Bolden
See United States v. Crouch, 46 F.3d 871, 875 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
See United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1447 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 128 (1995); United States v. Bennett, 219 F.3d 1117, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (recognizing that with “guarded or coded language, a higher rate of nonrelevant intercepted calls should be expected because it takes longer to figure out the meaning of a particular call”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1056 , 121 S.Ct. 666 , 148 L.Ed.2d 568 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rady I. Sdoulam, Also Known as Rady I. Sduolam, Also Known as Roddy Ibrahim, Also Known as Rady A. Sdoulam
See United States v. Crouch, 46 F.3d 871, 874 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 129 (1995); United States v. Dijan, 37 F.3d 398, 403 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1044 , 115 S.Ct. 1418 , 131 L.Ed.2d 302 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry Young
See United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440 , 1448 *648 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 128 (1995); United States v. Homick, 964 F.2d 899, 903 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Willis, 890 F.2d 1099, 1102 (10th Cir.1989); United States v. Losing, 560 F.2d 906 , 909 n. 1 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969 , 98 S.Ct. 516 , 54 L.Ed.2d 457 (1977); United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S.Ct. 111 , 46 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975); see also Bynum v. United States, 423 U.S. 952, 954 , 96 S.Ct. 357 , 358, 46 L.Ed.2d 277 (1975) (Br…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mansoori, Bahman
See United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1448 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S. Ct. 193 (1995); United States v. Homick, 964 F.2d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 1992); United States v. Willis, 890 F.2d 1099, 1102 (10th Cir. 1989); United States v. Losing, 560 F.2d 906 , 909 n.1 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 969 , 98 S. Ct. 516 (1977); United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29, 45 (3d Cir.), 12 Nos. 99-1492, 99-3533, 99-3569, 99-3570, 99-3623 cert. denied, 423 U.S. 858 , 96 S. Ct. 111 (1975); see also Bynum v. United States, 423 U.S. 952, 954 , 96 S. Ct. 357 , 358 (1975) (Brennan, J., disse…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Lynn Pennington
(2×)
See United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1445 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 , 116 S.Ct. 193 , 133 L.Ed.2d 128 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Pennington
See United States v. Ozar, 50 F.3d 1440, 1445 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 871 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger Turner
See United States v. Herrera, 54 F.3d 348, 354 (7th Cir.) (upholding district court’s refusal to give buyer-seller instruction where the alleged co-conspirators were not on opposite sides of the single drug transaction), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 192 , 133 L.Ed.2d 128 (1995); see also United States v. Ivy, 83 F.3d 1266, 1285-86 (10th Cir.1996) (noting that the purpose of the buyer-seller rule is to separate consumers, who generally do not share the criminal objective, from others who do further the objective of the conspiracy).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bauman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-283.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: D. Minnesota (1)
C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.