discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Leland Duane Young In determining whether an accused’s statements were made in the course of plea negotiations so as to trigger the application of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(6) and Federal Rule of Evidence 410, we “look to the specific facts of each case and examine ‘the totality of the surrounding circumstances.’ ” United States v. Hare, 49 F.3d 447, 451 (8th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Lloyd, 43 F.3d 1183, 1186 (8th Cir.1994)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 879 , 116 S.Ct. 211 , 516 U.S. 879 *909 (1995).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Cheryll S. Coon, United States of America v. Ferrell Travis Riley See United States v.. Hare, 49 F.3d 447 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 879 , 116 S.Ct. 211 , 133 L.Ed.2d 143 (1995).