green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Gipson v. Kroger Co
See id. at *4 (citing Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La. 05/10/96), 673 So.2d 585 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 (1996)).
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida L L C
See Id. at *4 (citing Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University, 95-1466 (La. 05/10/96), 673 So.2d 585 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 (1996)).
cited
Cited "see"
NYSA Series Trust v. Dessein
See De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 87 F.3d 65, 69 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct. 509 , 136 L.Ed.2d 399 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Silverstein v. Chase
See Lo Duca v. United States, 93 F.3d 1100, 1104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct. 508 , 136 L.Ed.2d 399 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Nebraska Department of Public Institutions
See Stallworth v. City of Evergreen, 680 So. 2d 229 (Ala. 1996), cert. denied 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S. Ct. 509 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chavez v. Gutwein
No. 33).) The Court may consider “documents appended to the [Amended Complaint]” when resolving a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, Leonard F., 199 F.3d at 107 (quotation marks omitted); see also De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., 87 F.3d 65, 69 (2d Cir. 1996) (“The complaint is deemed to include any document annexed to it as an exhibit.”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 (1996), and “where a conclusory allegation in the complaint is contradicted by a document attached to the complaint, the document controls and the allegation is not accepted as true,” Amidax, 671 F.3d at 147 ; see also, e.g.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roth v. Jennings
If the court takes judicial notice, it does so in order "to determine what statements [they] contained" — but "again not for the truth of the matters asserted." Kramer, 937 F.2d at 774 (emphases added); see, e.g., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rotches Pork Packers, Inc., 969 F.2d 1384, 1388 (2d Cir.1992). 62 A decision that a complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted is a ruling of law, see, e.g., De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 87 F.3d 65, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct. 509 , 136 L.Ed.2d 399 (1996); McCall v. Pataki, 232 F.3d 321, 322 (2d Cir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc.
Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., 521 So.2d 1123 (La.1988); see also Pitre v. Louisiana Tech Univ., 95-1466, 95-1487 (La.5/10/96), 673 So.2d 585 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct. 509 , 136 L.Ed.2d 399 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendelsohn v. Sequa Financial Corp. (In Re Frank Santora Equipment Corp.)
See also In re DeLaurentiis Entertainment Group Inc., 87 F.3d 1061, 1063 (9th Cir.) (discussing and following In re Hanna), cert. denied 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct. 510 , 136 L.Ed.2d 400 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Northern Telecom Ltd. Securities Litigation
See, e.g., De Jesus v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 87 F.3d 65, 69 (2d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1007 , 117 S.Ct. 509 , 136 L.Ed.2d 399 (1996)(citing inter alia Goldman, 754 F.2d at 1066 ); ESI Montgomery County, Inc. v. Montenay Intern.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nachreiner Boie Art Factory
v.
Goris
v.
Goris
No. 96-322.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1996.
Published
Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.