green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wisenbaker v. State
See United States v. Wadley, 59 F.3d 510, 512-13 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 895 , 117 S.Ct. 240 , 136 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996); Arnold v. State, 831 S.W.2d 556, 559 (Tex. App.-Austin 1992, pet. ref'd).
cited
Cited "see"
Nicholas G. Wisenbaker v. State
See United States v. Wadley, 59 F.3d 510, 512-13 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 895 (1996); Arnold v. State, 831 S.W.2d 556, 559 (Tex. App.—Austin 1992, pet. ref’d).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Acevedo, Unpublished Decision (8-3-2000)
See State v. Hill (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 195 , 208 , 661 N.E.2d 1068 , 1081 , certiorari denied (1996), 519 U.S. 895 , 117 S.Ct. 241 , 136 L.Ed.2d 170 ; Cincinnati v. Langan (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 22 , 27 , 640 N.E.2d 200 , 204 , appeal dismissed (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1425 , 638 N.E.2d 87 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alejandro
See, e.g., Vargas v. Keane, 86 F.3d 1273, 1275, 1278-79 (2d Cir.) (upholding a jury instruction that a reasonable doubt is “a doubt for which you can give a reason if called upon to do so by a fellow juror in the jury room”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 895 , 117 S.Ct. 240 , 136 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996); Chalmers, 73 F.3d at 1266 (upholding the district court’s charge to the jury that a reasonable doubt is “a doubt for which some good reason can be given”). “[J]ury instructions that imply that jurors should be ready to give a reason for their doubts are not approved and [are] perhaps unwise b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Strack
The challenged instruction is not to be viewed in isolation, but “in the context of the overall charge.” Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. at 147 , 94 S.Ct. at 400 ; see also, e.g., Vargas v. Keane, 86 F.3d 1273, 1277 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 895 , 117 S.Ct. 240 , 136 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996); Bramble v. Smith, 96 Civ. 5905, 1998 WL 395265 at *17 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gillette v. Greiner
The challenged instruction is not to be viewed in isolation, but “in the context of the overall charge.” Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. at 147 , 94 S.Ct. at 400 ; see also, e.g., Vargas v. Keane, 86 F.3d 1273, 1277 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 895 , 117 S.Ct. 240 , 136 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996); Bramble v. Smith, 96 Civ. 5905, 1998 WL 395265 at *17 (S.D.N.Y.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Neadle
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-5381.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.