green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Walbey v. Johnson
See Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767-68 (5th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Taylor
(2×)
See Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F. 3d 751, 769 (1996) (holding that state court’s application of federal law was not unreasonable because the Fifth Circuit panel split 2-1 on the underlying mixed constitutional question), cert. denied, 520 U. S. 1107 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis v. Mitchell
See Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997), overruled on other grounds by Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 , 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. Hopkins
See Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997); Lindh v. Murphy, 96 F.3d 856 (7th Cir.1996), rev’d on other grounds, 521 U.S. 320 , 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997); Neelley v. Nagle, 138 F.3d 917 (11th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 811 , 142 L.Ed.2d 671 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Knox v. Johnson
See Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767-68 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Zavaras
See Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767-68 (5th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 (997), 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 ; Carter v. Johnson, 110 F.3d 1098, 1103 (5th Cir.), cert. granted and judgment vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 409 , 139 L.Ed.2d 313 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bert L. Hunter v. Michael Bowersox
(2×)
See Carter v. Hopkins, 92 F.3d 666, 671 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1113 , 137 L.Ed.2d 314 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trigones v. Hall
See Id.; see, e.g., Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767-78 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997) (applying the "contrary to” language to issues of law and the "unreasonable application” language to mixed questions of law and fact); Neelley v. Nagle, 138 F.3d 917 , 923-24 (11th Cir.1998) (same); Perez v. Marshall, 946 F.Supp. 1521, 1532-33 (S.D.Cal.1996) (same standard of deference to both legal and mixed adjudications); Buehl v. Vaughn, No. 95-5917, 1996 WL 752959 , at *7 (E.D.Pa.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leka v. Portuondo
Compare Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir.1996) (holding that the "contrary to” language of § 2254(d)(1) applies to pure questions of law, while the "unreasonable application of” language applies to mixed questions of law and fact), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997), and Hennon v. Cooper, 109 F.3d 330, 334 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 819 , 118 S.Ct. 72 , 139 L.Ed.2d 32 (1997), and Neelley v. Nagle, 138 F.3d 917, 923-24 (11th Cir.1998) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 811 , 142 L.Ed.2d 671 (1999), with O’Brien v. Dub…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anthony N. Matteo v. Superintendent, Sci Albion the District Attorney of the County of Chester the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
(2×)
See also Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Matteo v. Supt SCI Albion
See also Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fisher v. State of Texas
Compare Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 766 (5th Cir.1996) (questioning whether that § 2254(d)(1) “is essentially only a codification of Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989), and thus constitutes no change in federal habeas law”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997), with Sharad Sushil Khandelwal, Note, The Path to Habeas Corpus Narrows: Interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 2251 (d)(1), 96 Mich. L.Rev. 434, 440 (1997) (“The 1996 amendment to § 2254(d)(1) should be read to adopt the Teague rule of retroactivity.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larry Nevers v. George Killinger, Warden of Fmc Fort Worth, Forth Worth, Texas, Kenneth McGinnis Michigan Department of Corrections
(2×)
See, e.g., Drinkard v. Johnson, 97 F.3d 751, 767 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1107 , 117 S.Ct. 1114 , 137 L.Ed.2d 315 (1997), overruled on other grounds by Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 , 117 S.Ct. 2059 , 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vrettos
v.
Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc.
v.
Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc.
No. 96-7310.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1997.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.