green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.3 score
“fischer ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stanley A. Rodowicz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Stanley A. Rodowicz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
fischer ii
discussed
Cited "see"
EEOC v. M&T Bank
Other circuits have provided a different formulation of the prima facie case under the ADA: “A prima facie case of disability discrimination under the ADA requires that the Employee (1) be a disabled person as defined by the ADA; (2) is qualified, with or without reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential functions of the job held or desired; and (3) suffered discrimination by an employer or prospective employer because of that disability.” EEOC v. Picture People, Inc., 684 F.3d 981, 985 (10th Cir. 2012); see, e.g., Kallail v. Alliant Energy Corp. Servs., Inc., 691 F.3d 925, 930 (8…
discussed
Cited "see"
GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant
See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A v. United States, 88 F.3d 1012, 1023 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied, in banc suggestion declined (Fed.Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1245 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Besler v. Board of Education
See Price v. City of Charlotte, 93 F.3d 1241, 1243, 1255-57 (4th Cir.1996) (reducing § 1983 emotional-distress damages award of $3,000 to nominal damages of $1 based on generic testimony that plaintiffs felt “betrayed,” “embarrassed,” “degraded,” and “devastated” over failure of municipality to promote on account of race), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997); Spence v. Bd. of Educ. of the Christina Sch.
discussed
Cited "see"
Besler v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF W. WINDSOR
See Price v. City of Charlotte, 93 F. 3d 1241, 1243, 1255-57 (4th Cir.1996) (reducing § 1983 emotional-distress damages award of $3,000 to nominal damages of $1 based on generic testimony that plaintiffs felt "betrayed," "embarrassed," "degraded," and "devastated" over failure of municipality to promote on account of race), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed. 2d 328 (1997); Spence v. Bd. of Educ. of the Christina Sch.
cited
Cited "see"
Tucker v. State
See Clark v. State, 929 S.W.2d 5, 9 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997); Brown v. State, 913 S.W.2d 577, 580-81 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States
See Wells Fargo Bank v. United States, 88 F.3d 1012, 1023 (Fed.Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1245 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997); Glendale Federal Bank, FSB v. United States, 43 Fed.Cl. 390, 397-98 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth Subsidiary, L.P. v. Szurek
See Sanders v. Arneson Prods., Inc., 91 F.3d 1351, 1354 (9th Cir.1996) (holding plaintiffs four-month temporary impairment was too brief to be a “disability”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1247 , 137 L.Ed.2d 329 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Columbia Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth Subsidiary, L.P. v. Carol Szurek
See Sanders v. Arneson Prods., Inc. , 91 F.3d 1351, 1354 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding plaintiff's four-month temporary impairment was too brief to be a “disability”), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1116 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Columbia Plaza Medical Center of Fort Worth Subsidiary, L.P. v. Carol Szurek
See Sanders v. Arneson Prods., Inc. , 91 F.3d 1351, 1354 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding plaintiff's four-month temporary impairment was too brief to be a "disability"), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1116 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Granados v. State
(2×)
See Clark v. State, 929 S.W.2d 5, 7 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997); Riley v. State, 889 S.W.2d 290, 300 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1137 , 115 S.Ct. 2569 , 132 L.Ed.2d 821 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Witt v. Northwest Aluminum Co.
See Sanders v. Arneson Prods., Inc., 91 F.3d 1351, 1353 (9th Cir.1996) (citing regulation), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1247 , 137 L.Ed.2d 329 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Mercer v. Duke University
See Price v. City of Charlotte, 93 F.3d 1241, 1249 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.
See Price v. City of Charlotte, N.C., 93 F.3d 1241, 1248-49 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997) (holding that a party must assert the same reasons in its Rule 50(b) motion as advanced in its Rule 50(a) motion); see e.g.
cited
Cited "see"
No. 98-1604
See Price v. City of Charlotte, 93 F.3d 1241, 1250-56 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 (1997), 117 S.Ct. 1246 ; Patterson v. P.H.P.
cited
Cited "see"
Melissa Forshee v. Waterloo Industries
See Price v. City of Charlotte, 93 F.3d 1241, 1250-56 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 (1997), 117 S.Ct. 1246 ; Patterson v. P.H.P.
discussed
Cited "see"
Adamczyk v. Lever Brothers Co.
See Fischer v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 96 F.3d 1533, 1539 (3d Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1247 , 137 L.Ed.2d 329 (1997) (“An ERISA fiduciary is under no obligation to offer precise predictions about future changes to its plan.
cited
Cited "see"
Petit v. City of Chicago
See Price v. City of Charlotte, N.C., 93 F.3d 1241 , 1245-48 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997); Koski v. Gainer, 1993 WL 488409 *2 (N.D.Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
EEOC v. M&T Bank
Other circuits have provided a different formulation of the prima facie case under the ADA: “A prima facie case of disability discrimination under the ADA requires that the Employee (1) be a disabled person as defined by the ADA; (2) is qualified, with or without reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential functions of the job held or desired; and (3) suffered discrimination by an employer or prospective employer because of that disability.” EEOC v. Picture People, Inc., 684 F.3d 981, 985 (10th Cir. 2012); see, e.g., Kallail v. Alliant Energy Corp. Servs., Inc., 691 F.3d 925, 930 (8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
EEOC v. M&T Bank
Other circuits have provided a different formulation of the prima facie case under the ADA: “A prima facie case of disability discrimination under the ADA requires that the Employee (1) be a disabled person as defined by the ADA; (2) is qualified, with or without reasonable accommodation, to perform the essential functions of the job held or desired; and (3) suffered discrimination by an employer or prospective employer because of that disability.” EEOC v. Picture People, Inc., 684 F.3d 981, 985 (10th Cir. 2012); see, e.g., Kallail v. Alliant Energy Corp. Servs., Inc., 691 F.3d 925, 930 (8…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United States
See Northern Helex Co. v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 862 , 524 F.2d 707, 720-21 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 866 , 97 S.Ct. 176 , 50 L.Ed.2d 146 (1976) (indicating a party may not recover damages “if they are such as would have been realized by the party from other independent and collateral undertakings, although entered into in consequence and on the faith of the principal contract”) (quoting Myerle v. United States, 33 Ct.Cl. 1, 26 (1897)); see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. United States, 88 F.3d 1012, 1022-23 (Fed.Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1245 , 137 L.Ed.2d …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Illinois Power Co.
See also Oliver v. Oshkosh Truck Corp., 96 F.3d 992, 997 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1116 , 117 S.Ct. 1246 , 137 L.Ed.2d 328 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-924.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1997.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.