green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"persons" provision in Article 18.02, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, did "not appear to have a clear and unambiguous meaning"
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“TILA does not require perfect notice; rather it requires a clear and conspicuous notice of rescission rights.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Santos-Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp.
tila does not require perfect notice; rather it requires a clear and conspicuous notice of rescission rights.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kutzner v. State
persons" provision in article 18.02, texas code of criminal procedure, did "not appear to have a clear and unambiguous meaning
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joan Peter Sarah Peter, a Minor, by and Through Her Parent and Natural Guardian Joan Peter Krista Westendorp Douglas Westendorp Aaron Westendorp, a Minor, by and Through His Parents and Natural Guardians Krista Westendorp and Douglas Westendorp v. Christine Jax, Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning Jesse Ventura, Governor, State of Minnesota Independent School District, No. 877, Buffalo, Minnesota Independent School District, No. 273, Edina, Minnesota.
fee-seeker show both materiality and causation as prerequisites to achieving prevailing party status
discussed
Cited "see"
Scales, Courtney Jay
Valdez v. State, 952 S.W.2d 622, 624 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, writ ref'd) (quoting Landrum v. State, 788 S.W.2d 577, 579 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) and Griffin v. State, 486 S.W.2d 948, 951 (Tex.Crim.App.1972)); see Ramos v. State, 934 S.W.2d 358, 369 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 520 U.S. 1198 , 117 S.Ct. 1556 , 137 L.Ed.2d 704 (1997). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Real Property Located at 4125 Blanton, Wichita Falls, Wichita County v. State
See Ramos v. State, 934 S.W.2d 358, 362-63 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (holding that evidence obtained from valid search warrant did not violate constitutional due process provisions), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1198 , 117 S.Ct. 1556 , 137 L.Ed.2d 704 (1997); Phenix v. State, 488 S.W.2d 759, 767 (Tex.Ciim.App.1973) (stating that seizure conducted within parameters of a valid search warrant did not violate defendant’s constitutional rights where officers acted in accordance with procedural guidelines).
discussed
Cited "see"
Display Technologies, Inc. v. Paul Flum Ideas, Inc.
See Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc., 99 F.3d 1098, 1106 (Fed.Cir.1996) (“attorney argument cannot control in light of the language of the claim.”) cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1198 , 117 S.Ct. 1555 , 137 L.Ed.2d 703 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Larrabee v. Bank of America, N.A.
“Most courts have concluded that the TILA’s clear and conspicuous standard is less demanding than a requirement of perfect notice.” Santos-Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp., 485 F.3d 12, 16 (1st Cir.2007); see also Veale v. Citibank, F.S.B., 85 F.3d 577, 580-81 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1198 , 117 S.Ct. 1556 , 137 L.Ed.2d 704 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reyes v. State
See also, Ramos v. State, 934 S.W.2d 358, 369 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 520 U.S. 1198 , 117 S.Ct. 1556 , 137 L.Ed.2d 704 (1997); Bass v. State, 622 S.W.2d 101, 106 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 965 , 102 S.Ct. 2046 , 72 L.Ed.2d 491 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Triem
v.
Alaska Bar Assn.
v.
Alaska Bar Assn.
No. 96-1421.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 1997.
520 U.S. 1198
Sup. Ct. Alaska. Certiorari denied.