Atuahene v. New Jersey Dep't of Transp., 522 U.S. 1044 (1998). · Go Syfert
Atuahene v. New Jersey Dep't of Transp., 522 U.S. 1044 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Department of Telecommunications & Energy (mass, 2001-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Department of Telecommunications & Energy
Mass. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Orthopaedic Hosp. v. Belshe, 103 F.3d 1491 , 1495 (9th Cir. 1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1044 (1998); Turner v. Perales, 869 F.2d 140, 141 (2d Cir. 1989).
discussed Cited "see" At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
W.D. Mo. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Orthopaedic Hosp. v. Belshe, 103 F.3d 1491 , 1495 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1044 , 118 S.Ct. 684 , 139 L.Ed.2d 632 (1998) (state agency interpretation of Medicaid Act reviewed de novo); Turner v. Perales, 869 F.2d 140, 141 (2d Cir.1989) (state agency interpretations of housing statute reviewed de novo); Amisub (PSL), Inc. v. State of Colo. Dep’t of Soc.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smithers v. C & G Custom Module Hauling
E.D. Va. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579, 592-97 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993); Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 141 , 119 S.Ct. 1167 , 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999); see also Cavallo v. Star Enter., 892 F.Supp. 756, 761 (E.D.Va.1995), aff'd in part rev’d in part and remanded, 100 F.3d 1150 (4th Cir.1996), and cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1044 , 118 S.Ct. 684 , 139 L.Ed.2d 631 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atuahene
v.
New Jersey Department of Transportation
No. 97-6750.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
522 U.S. 1044
Published

C. A. Sd Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 2,1998, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.