green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Dynegy, Inc.
ypicality focuses on the similarity between the named plaintiffs' legal and remedial theories and the ... theories of those whom they purport to represent
cited
Cited "see"
Pena v. Atascosa County
See Lightbourn v. County of El Paso, Tex., 118 F.3d 421, 427 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Simmang v. Texas Board of Law Examiners
See Lightbourn v. County of El Paso, Tex., 118 F.3d 421, 427 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 643 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Oelsner v. Government of the Virgin Islands of the United States Ex Rel. Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue
See United States v. West Indies Transp., Inc., 127 F.3d 299 (3d Cir.1997) (affirming convictions and sentences), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 644 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
WIT Equipment Co. v. Director, Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue
See United States v. West Indies Transp., Inc., 127 F.3d 299 (3d Cir.1997) (affirming convictions and sentences), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 644 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Francis v. Ingles
See Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531, 1537 (10th Cir.1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 702 , - L.Ed.2d - (1998); Andes v. Versant Corp., 788 F.2d 1033, 1036 (4th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Deleveaux
See United States v. Chirinos, 112 F.3d 1089, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 (1998); United States v. Chandler, 996 F.2d 1073, 1085 (11th Cir. 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Deleveaux
See United States v. Chirinos, 112 F.3d 1089, 1096 (11th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 701 , 139 L.Ed.2d 644 (1998); United States v. Chandler, 996 F.2d 1073, 1085 (11th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Medrano
See United States v. Schae- *316 fer, 107 F.3d 1280, 1285 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 701 , 139 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998); United States v. Flowers, 995 F.2d 315, 316-17 (1st Cir.1993); United States v. Gullickson, 981 F.2d 344, 349 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Shewmaker, 936 F.2d 1124, 1128 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1037 , 112 S.Ct. 884 , 116 L.Ed.2d 788 (1992); United States v. Pedrioli, 931 F.2d 31, 32 (9th Cir.1991); United States v. Stewart, 917 F.2d 970, 973 (6th Cir.1990); United States v. Miller, 903 F.2d 341, 349 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. R…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Perez-Montanez
See United States v. West Indies Transp., Inc., 127 F.3d 299, 306 (3d Cir.1997) (“Defendants here have not brought to our attention any facts suggesting that a jury might have reached a conclusion different from the district court .... ”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 644 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. County of Schoharie
See Lightbourn v. El Paso, 118 F.3d 421 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom., Lightbourn v. Garza, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 643 (1998). 6 Ultimately, to prevail on their complaint, plaintiffs must show three things: (1) that they are qualified individuals with a disability (2) who, by reason of their disabilities, are excluded from participation in or denied the benefits *25 of (3) a “service, program or activity” of a public entity.
discussed
Cited "see"
New York Ex Rel. Spitzer v. County of Delaware
See Lightbourn v. El Paso, 118 F.3d 421 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub nom., Lightbourn v. Garza, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 643 (1998). 7 Ultimately, to prevail on their complaint, plaintiffs must show three things: (1) that they are qualified individuals with a disability (2) who, by reason of their disabilities, are excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of (3) a “service, program or activity” of a public entity.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Cosentino
See also United States v. West Indies Transport, Inc., 127 F.3d 299, 313 (3rd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 644 (1998) ("[W]e hold that the entrapment by estoppel defense applies where the defendant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) a government official '(2) told the defendant that certain criminal conduct was legal, (3) the defendant actually relied on the government official's statements, (4) and the defendant’s reliance was in good faith and reasonable in light of the identity of the government official, the point of law repres…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Kratsas
See, e.g., United States v. West Indies Transport, Inc., 127 F.3d 299, 311-12 (3rd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1052 , 118 S.Ct. 700 , 139 L.Ed.2d 644 (1998); United States v. Smith, 940 F.2d 710, 714 (1st Cir.1991); Guzman, 968 P.2d at 210 ; Miller, 492 S.E.2d at 488 .
Lightbourn
v.
Garza, Secretary of State of Texas
v.
Garza, Secretary of State of Texas
No. 97-926.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.