Unisys Corp. v. Ceska Sporitelna, A. S., 522 U.S. 1069 (1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Unisys Corp. v. Ceska Sporitelna, A. S., 522 U.S. 1069 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nenno v. State (texcrimapp, 1998-06-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nenno v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Freeman v. Case Corp., 118 F.3d 1011 , 1016 n. 6 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 739 , 139 L.Ed.2d 676 (1998)(“where an expert relies on his experience and training and not a particular methodology to reach his conclusions” Daubert “analysis” is inappropriate); United States v. Bighead, 128 F.3d 1329, 1330 (9th Cir.1997)(Daubert’s tests for admissibility “do not require exclusion of expert testimony that involves specialized knowledge rather than scientific theory”); Compton v. Subaru of America, 82 F.3d 1513 , 1518 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Unisys Corp.
v.
Ceska Sporitelna, A. S.
No. 97-594.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1998.
522 U.S. 1069
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of Ford Motor Co. et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.