Porter v. Gilmore, 522 U.S. 1093 (1998). · Go Syfert
Porter v. Gilmore, 522 U.S. 1093 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Serge (pactcompllackaw, 2001-09-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Serge
pactcompllackaw · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Hood, 53 Cal. App. 4th 965 , 62 Cal. Rptr.2d 137 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1997) (computer animation of shooting), cert. denied sub nom., Hood v. California, 522 U.S. 1093 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, Warden (2×)
6th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weeks v. Bowersox, 119 F.3d 1342 , 1354 n. 12 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 887 , 139 L.Ed.2d 874 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hamilton v. Roehrich
D. Minnesota · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
The “fundamental miscarriage of justice” exception is available only upon a “showing, based on new evidence, that ‘a constitutional violation has probably resulted in the conviction of one who is actually innocent.’ ” Brownlow v. Groose, 66 F.3d 997, 999 (8th Cir.l995)[emphasis added], cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1161 , 116 S.Ct. 1049 , 134 L.Ed.2d 194 (1996), quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 , 115 S.Ct. 851 , 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995); see also, Weeks v. Bowersox, 119 F.3d 1342, 1350 (8th Cir. 1997)(“To fit within the fundamental miscarriage of justice exception, a petitioner m…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Loudner
D.S.D. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Weeks v. Bowersox, 119 F.3d 1342, 1350 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 887 , 139 L.Ed.2d 874 (1998). 9 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hill v. United States
E.D. Wis. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Porter v. Gramley, 122 F.3d 351, 353 (7th Cir.1997) (“Strickland’s ‘reasonable probability' language does not require a petitioner to meet a preponderance of the evidence threshold, but it does require a petitioner to show ‘a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’ ”), certiorari denied, 522 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 886 , 139 L.Ed.2d 873 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Porter
v.
Gilmore, Warden
No. 97-6773.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1998.
522 U.S. 1093
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.