green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cummings
(2×)
See State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 36-37 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 412 (1997) (citing State v. Johnson, 298 N.C. 355, 368 , 259 S.E.2d 752, 761 (1979)), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S.Ct. 1094 , 140 L.Ed.2d 150 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
(2×)
See State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 36-37 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 412 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S.Ct. 1094 , 140 L.Ed.2d 150 (1998); and State v. Solomon, 340 N.C. 212, 218 , 456 S.E.2d 778, 783 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 996 , 116 S.Ct. 533 , 133 L.Ed.2d 438 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
See State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1 , 36-37, 489 S.E.2d 391 , 412 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fernon
See United States v. Ramos-Oseguera, 120 F.3d 1028, 1036 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S.Ct. 1094 , 140 L.Ed.2d 149 (1998) (concluding that vehicle search was not a contemporaneous search incident to arrest, because search occurred after police brought car to police station, and while defendants were inside police station); United States v. Adams, 26 F.3d 702, 705 (7th Cir.1994) (concluding that search was not incident to arrest because defendant was “not an occupant of the searched vehicle immediately prior to arrest, [and] he was not affirmatively linked to it until aft…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Farook
Id.; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S. Ct. 1094 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Farook
Id.; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S. Ct. 1094 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Howell
Id.; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bethea
See id. ; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S. Ct. 1094 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Allen
See id,; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
Our Supreme Court has articulated the rationale behind this prohibition as follows: “The legislature apparently intended that jurors not be given a distorted view of the case before them by an initial exposure to the case through the stilted language of. indictments and other pleadings.” State v. Leggett, 305 N.C. 213, 218 , 287 S.E.2d 832, 836 (1982) (emphasis added); see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 35 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 411 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 140 L.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Spivey
(4×)
Id.; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Grooms
See id.; see also State v. Flowers, 347 N.C. 1, 27 , 489 S.E.2d 391, 406 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sealed Case No. 98-3116
For cases from other circuits, see, e.g., United States v. Webb, 139 F.3d 1390, 1395 (11th Cir.1998); United States v. Mummert, 34 F.3d 201, 205 (3d Cir.1994); United States v. Brown, 985 F.2d 478, 481 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Ritchey, 949 F.2d 61, 63 (2d Cir.1991); United States v. Deigert, 916 F.2d 916, 919 (4th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Ramos-Oseguera, 120 F.3d 1028, 1040-41 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1135 , 118 S.Ct. 1094 , 140 L.Ed.2d 149 (1998). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Todd
v.
Hawk, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
v.
Hawk, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
No. 97-7409.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.