Discon, Inc. v. NYNEX Corp., 522 U.S. 809 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Discon, Inc. v. NYNEX Corp., 522 U.S. 809 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“because the carmack amendment was intended to provide uniformity to claims for the loss or damage to goods, the goal of uniformity is not frustrated by the allowance of tote law claims for injuries that are separate and distinct from such loss or damage”
18 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Allite, Inc. (mass, 2000-02-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Allite, Inc.
Mass. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
because the carmack amendment was intended to provide uniformity to claims for the loss or damage to goods, the goal of uniformity is not frustrated by the allowance of tote law claims for injuries that are separate and distinct from such loss or damage
cited Cited "see" Stephenson v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.
D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rini v. United, Van Lines, Inc., 104 F.3d 502, 504 (1st Cir.1997) (Carmack Amendment passed “without discussion or debate”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 809 , 118 S.Ct. 51 , 139 L.Ed.2d 16 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Hoover v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
D. Kan. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rini v. United Van Lines, Inc., 104 F.3d 502, 504 (1st Cir.1997) (Carmack Amendment passed “without discussion or debate”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 809 , 118 S.Ct. 51 , 139 L.Ed.2d 16 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Discon, Inc.
v.
NYNEX Corp.
No. 96-1785.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
522 U.S. 809
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 70%
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.