green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Housel
See United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre, 108 F.3d 1228 , 1237 n. 8 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 847 , 118 S.Ct. 132 , 139 L.Ed.2d 81 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. LaHue
See United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre, 108 F.3d 1228 , 1237 n. 8 (10th Cir.) (holding it is the appellant’s responsibility to tie the relevant facts, supported by specific citations to the record, to his legal arguments), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 847 , 118 S.Ct. 132 , 139 L.Ed.2d 81 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert C. Lahue, United States of America v. Dan Anderson, United States of America v. Ronald H. Lahue, the American Hospital Association Federation of American Health Systems Association of American Medical Colleges American Osteopathic Association Missouri Hospital Association National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amici Curiae
See United States v. Rodriquez-Aguirre, 108 F.3d 1228 , 1237 n.8 (10th Cir.) (holding it is the appellant's responsibility to tie the relevant facts, supported by specific citations to the record, to his legal arguments), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 847 (1997). 113 Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant immunity to the twelve unnamed defense witnesses, because use immunity is the sole prerogative of the executive branch and defendants provided no facts to support their claim the government engaged in a deliberate attempt to distort the fact-finding process…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. LaHue
See United States v. Rodriquez-Aguirre, 108 F.3d 1228 , 1237 n.8 (10th Cir.) (holding it is the appellant's responsibility to tie the relevant facts, supported by specific citations to the record, to his legal arguments), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 847 (1997). 120 Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant immunity to the twelve unnamed defense witnesses, because use immunity is the sole prerogative of the executive branch and defendants provided no facts to support their claim the government engaged in a deliberate attempt to distort the fact-finding process…
discussed
Cited "see"
Blum v. United States
See United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre, 108 F.3d 1228 , 1238 n.8 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 847 (1997). -4- In reviewing Mr. Blum’s “grounds” for appeal, we note he merely raises patently repetitive, vague and unsupported assertions, rather than articulating the relevant facts, record citations, his legal contentions, or the district court’s alleged error.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shomade
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-9400.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.