green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Diggins v. Vannoy
See Livingston v. Johnson, 107 F.3d 297, 309 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 880 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bartee v. Quarterman
See Livingston v. Johnson, 107 F.3d 297, 312-13 (5th Cir.) (analyzing the difference under Texas law between felony murder and capital murder in the course of rejecting a Beck claim), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 880 , 118 S.Ct. 204 , 139 L.Ed.2d 141 (1997); East v. Scott, 55 F.3d 996, 1005-06 (5th Cir.1995) (examining the distinction under Texas law between murder and felony murder, as well as the impact under Texas law of evidence of voluntary intoxication, in analyzing a Beck claim); Cordova v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d at 768-70 (analyzing the distinction under Texas law between capital murder and murde…
discussed
Cited "see"
Berkley v. Quarterman
See Livingston v. Johnson, 107 F.3d 297, 312-13 (5th Cir.1997)(analyzing the difference under Texas law between felony murder and capital murder in the course of rejecting a Beck claim), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 880 , 118 S.Ct. 204 , 139 L.Ed.2d 141 (1997); East v. Scott, 55 F.3d 996, 1005-06 (5th Cir.1995)(examining the distinction under Texas between murder and felony murder, as well as the impact under Texas of evidence of voluntary intoxication, in analyzing a Beck claim); Cordova v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d at 768-70 (analyzing the distinction under Texas law between capital murder and murder, as …
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanton v. Quarterman
See Livingston v. Johnson, 107 F.3d 297, 312-13 (5th Cir.1997) (analyzing the difference under Texas law between felony murder and capital murder in the course of rejection a Beck claim), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 880 , 118 S.Ct. 204 , 139 L.Ed.2d 141 (1997); East v. Scott, 55 F.3d 996, 1005-06 (5th Cir.1995)(examining the distinction under Texas between murder and felony murder, as well as the impact under Texas of evidence of voluntary intoxication, in analyzing a Beck claim); Cordova v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d at 768-70 (analyzing the distinction under Texas law between capital murder and murder, as…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Trotter
See United States v. Covert, 117 F.3d 940, 946-49 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 880 , 118 S.Ct. 204 , 139 L.Ed.2d 140 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Lehane
In Sumner v. Mata, 449 U.S. 539 , 101 S.Ct. 764 , 66 L.Ed.2d 722 (1981) (Sumner I), the Supreme Court explained that Section 2254(d) does not “specify any procedural requirements that must be satisfied for there to be a ‘hearing on the merits of a factual issue,’ other than that the habeas applicant and the state or its agent be parties to the state proceeding and that the state-court determination be evidenced by a ‘written finding, written opinion, or other reliable and adequate written indicia.’ ” Id. at 546-47 , 101 S.Ct. 764 ; accord Livingston v. Johnson, 107 F.3d 297, 303 (5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dolcefino v. Randolph
See, e.g., Morton v. GTE North, Inc., 922 F.Supp. 1169 (N.D.Tex.1996) (interpreting federal counterpart to Rule 166a, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, holding objections to summary judgment evidence should be ruled upon before court rules on motion), aff'd, 114 F.3d 1182 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 880 , 118 S.Ct. 205 , 139 L.Ed.2d 141 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Covert
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-5178.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.