green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“in this case, the trial judge properly rejected the proposition that by killing persons in order to prevent them from performing legal abortions, hill acted under a pretense of moral justification.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nelson v. State
in this case, the trial judge properly rejected the proposition that by killing persons in order to prevent them from performing legal abortions, hill acted under a pretense of moral justification.
cited
Cited "see"
Middleton v. State
See Hall v. Washington, 106 F.3d 742, 750 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 264 , 139 L.Ed.2d 190 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Staver v. American Bar Ass'n
See Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. American Bar Ass’n, 107 F.3d 1026, 1030 (3d Cir.) (“Many states have methods of satisfying the legal education requirement other than graduation from an ABA-accredited school.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 264 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Roeder
The rationale utilized by “[tjhe majority of courts. . . [was] that because abortion is a lawful, constitutionally protected act, it is not a legally recognized harm *916 which can justify illegal conduct.” 253 Kan. at 293 ; see also Hill v. State, 688 So. 2d 901, 906 (Fla. 1996) (rejecting the necessity defense to charges of first-degree murder for killing an abortion clinic physician and a volunteer and stating that harm component of its inquiiy cannot be met by legal abortions as a matter of law), cert. denied 522 U.S. 907 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01
See also Tank Insulation Int'l, Inc. v. Insultherm, Inc., 104 F.3d 83, 85-86 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997) (two claims satisfy the transaction-or-occurrence test where, inter alia, the issues of fact and law "largely are the same” and “whether substantially the same evidence” will support or refute the claims); Third Degree Films v. Does 1-47, 286 F.R.D. 188, 194 (D.Mass.2012). 50 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reeves v. State
See Bowen, 698 So.2d at 250-51 ; see also Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 904-05 (Fla.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Hyundai Electronics Industries, Co.
Co. v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co., 324 U.S. 806, 815 , 65 S.Ct. 993, 998 , 89 L.Ed. 1381 (1945), quoting from Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 246 , 64 S.Ct. 997 , 88 L.Ed. 1250 (1944)); see also Tank Insulation Intern. v. Insultherm, 104 F.3d 83 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 265 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Idaho
In this respect, the Idaho Statehood Act “operated to confirm [Idaho’s] title to equal footing lands ... unless the United States clearly withheld submerged lands ... prior to statehood.” Alaska, 117 S.Ct. at 1917 ; see also United States v. Gardner, 107 F.3d 1314, 1319-20 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining that .disclaimer clause is a recognition of preexisting United States title), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 907 , 118 S.Ct. 264 , 139 L.Ed.2d 191 (1997); cf. Aam, 887 F.2d at 198 (concluding that submerged lands were not “held” by tribe within meaning of disclaimer clause because tribe had not s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Washington, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections
v.
Hall
v.
Hall
No. 97-188.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Florida (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.