green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…in conducting this inquiry the district court decides only whether there was an agreement to arbitrate, and if so, whether the agreement is valid.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Iowa Health System v. Trinity Health Corp.
See id.; Kellogg Co. v. Exxon Corp., 209 F.3d 562, 575 (6th Cir.) (“In order for a party to succeed on a claim of abandonment, it must prove the elements of both non-use and intent, i.e., that the other party actually abandoned its marks through non-use and that it intended to do so.”) (citing cases), cert. *919 denied, 531 U.S. 944 , 121 S.Ct. 340 , 148 L.Ed.2d 273 (2000); but see Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1070, 1080 (5th Cir.) (“[U]nlike abandonment through non-use ..., an intent to abandon the mark is expressly not required to prove abandonment under [the second s…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
MicroBilt Corp. v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (In re MicroBilt Corp.)
(2×)
in conducting this inquiry the district court decides only whether there was an agreement to arbitrate, and if so, whether the agreement is valid.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tumblebus Inc v. Cranmer
because naked licensing is generally ultimately relevant only to establish an unintentional trademark abandonment which results in a loss of trademark rights against the world, the burden of proof faced by third parties attempting to show abandonment through naked licensing is st…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
New Albany-Floyd County Education Ass'n v. Ammerman
when a motion to dismiss is filed pursuant to ind. trial rule 12(b)(6) and matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the trial court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in ind. trial rule 56.
cited
Cited "see"
MT Technology Enterprises, LLC v. Nolte (In re Nolte)
See Pahlavi v. Ansari (In re Ansari), 113 F.3d 17, 19 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLC
Bd. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 310 F.3d 870, 877 (5th Cir.2002); see Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1070, 1074 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 915 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 231 (1997); Fontenot v. Upjohn Co., 780 F.2d 1190, 1194 (5th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gellhaus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Bd. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 310 F.3d 870, 877 (5th Cir.2002); see Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1070, 1074 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 915 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 231 (1997); Fontenot v. Upjohn Co., 780 F.2d 1190, 1194 (5th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
KGB International, Inc. v. Watford (In Re Watford)
See In re Ansari, 113 F.3d 17, 20 (4th Cir.1997)(“[A] ‘defalcation’ for purposes of this statute does not have to rise to the level of ‘fraud,’ ‘embezzlement,’ or even ‘misappropriation.’ ”) (citations omitted, brackets in original), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Acacia Life Insurance
Accord, e.g., Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 926 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Hong v. Children's Memorial Hospital, 936 F.2d 967, 970-971 (7th Cir.1991); Griffin *574 v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., 883 F.2d 940, 943 (11th Cir.1989). 28 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tumblebus Inc. v. Meredith Cranmer, D/B/A Tumblebus of Louisville
See Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1070, 1075-76 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 915 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 231 (1997) (“Because naked licensing is generally ultimately relevant only to establish an unintentional *765 trademark abandonment which results in a loss of trademark rights against the world, the burden of proof faced by third parties attempting to show abandonment through naked licensing is stringent.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Ackah v. Hershey Foods Corp.
See Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 925 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 .
cited
Cited "see"
E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. Spider Webs Ltd.
See Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1070, 1081 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 915 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 231 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Armor v. Lantz
See Armor v. Michelin Tire Corp., 113 F.3d 1231 , 1997 WL 245217 (4th Cir.1997) (unpublished), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 915 , 118 S.Ct. 301 , 139 L.Ed.2d 232 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutchinson (Godlove) v. Pfeil
See Hutchinson v. Pfeil, 105 F.3d 562 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Hutchinson v. Pfeil, No. 98-5043, 1999 WL 1015557 (10th Cir. Nov.9, 1999) (unpublished). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Terri Welles, Inc.
See Tiffany Design, Inc. v. Reno-Tahoe Specialty, Inc., 55 F.Supp.2d 1113, 1122 (D.Nev.1999) (citing Exxon Corp. v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc., 109 F.3d 1070, 1074 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 915 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 231 (1997) and F.D.I.C. v. Giammettei, 34 F.3d 51 , 54 (2d Cir.1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patricia M. Pivirotto v. Innovative Systems, Inc
(2×)
See Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913 , 920 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission v. National Football League
See Read v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C., 110 F.3d 543 , 546 (8th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Admiral Theatre Corp., 585 F.2d at 893-94 .
cited
Cited "see"
St. Louis Convention & Visitors Commission v. National Football League
See Read v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C., 110 F.3d 543 , 546 (8th Cir.), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Admiral Theatre Corp., 585 F.2d at 893-94 .
cited
Cited "see"
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C. Lynn A. Hendrickson, M.D. Andrew Ian Soye, M.D. Daryl R. Wierda, M.D., St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C. Lynn A. Hendrickson, M.D. Andrew Ian Soye, M.D. Daryl R. Wierda, M.D.
See Read v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C., 110 F.3d 543 , 544 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C.
See Read v. Medical X-Ray Center, P.C., 110 F.3d 543 , 544 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Percy A. McNutt v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
See Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 932-36 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Tanca v. Nordberg, 98 F.3d 680, 682-85 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, —• U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1253 , 137 L.Ed.2d 333 (1997); Riess v. Dalton, 845 F.Supp. 742, 744-45 (S.D.Cal.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
ROBERT FRANK McALPINE ARCH., INC. v. Heilpern
See Great Western Mortgage Corp. v. Peacock , 110 F.3d 222 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997) (rejecting the argument that Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. , 7 F.3d 1110 (3d Cir. 1993), had changed the law in the Third Circuit).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yancey v. National Center on Institutions & Alternatives
See Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 933-35 (3d Cir.1997)(“mixed motive” analysis not applicable to claim of unlawful retaliation, notwithstanding 1991 amendments to Title VII), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Tanca v. Nordberg, 98 F.3d 680, 682-83 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied., — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1253 , 137 L.Ed.2d 333 (1997)(same); but see Beinlich v. Curry Development, Inc., 54 F.3d 772 (4th Cir.1995)(table), 1995 WL 311577, at *3 (May 22, 1995)(assuming “mixed motive” analysis applied to retaliation claim)(dicta).
cited
Cited "see"
Krouse v. American Sterilizer Company
See Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 920 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Collins v. TRL, INC.
Likewise, the PHRA makes it unlawful for an employer “to discriminate in any manner against any individual because such individual has opposed any practice forbidden by this act, or because such individual has made a charge ... under this act.” 43 P.S. § 955(d); see also Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913, 919-20 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997) The law provides that to establish a prima facie case of retaliation the plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) he was engaged in protected activity; (2) the employer took an adverse employment actio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lidwell v. University Park Nursing Care Center
See also Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., 109 F.3d 913 , 920 and 920 n. 2 (3d Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997) (applying burden-shifting analysis to retaliation claim); Clarkson v. Penna.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
See also Hutchinson v. Pfeil, 105 F.3d 562, 565 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Gray v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al., 937 F.Supp. 153, 156 (D.R.I.1996); Doe v. Marsh, et al., 899 F.Supp. 933, 934 (N.D.N.Y.1995); United States v. Premises Known as 281 Syosset Woodbury Road, 862 F.Supp. 847, 851 (E.D.N.Y.1994), aff'd, 71 F.3d 1067 (2d Cir.1995); Schwartz v. Marketing Publishing Company, 153 F.R.D. 16, 22 (D.Conn.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randall v. Buena Vista County Hospital
Louis Convention & Visitors Comm’n, 154 F.3d at 861 ; see also Read v. Medical X-Ray Ctr., P.C., 110 F.3d 543 , 545 (8th Cir.1997) (stating one element of the claim to be that the defendant’s “allegedly anticompetitive conduct was ‘a material cause’ of [the plaintiffs] injury”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 914 , 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sterling Factors, Inc. v. Whelan (In Re Whelan)
See also Pahlavi v. Ansari (In re Ansari), 113 F.3d 17 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Gober v. Terra + Corp. (In re Gober), 100 F.3d 1195 (5th Cir.1996) (where the courts held that when a party has appeared and litigated a matter, state court default judgments subsequently entered for discovery violations can act as collateral estoppel in a bankruptcy dischargeability case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCart v. Jordana (In Re Jordana)
See also Pahlavi v. Ansari (In re Ansari), 113 F.3d 17 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Gober v. Terra + Corp. (In re Gober), 100 F.3d 1195 (5th Cir.1996) (applying state court principles of collateral estoppel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ackerman v. the Money Store
See also Great Western Mortgage Corp. v. Peacock, 110 F. 3d 222 (1997), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 299 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 230 (1997); Crawford v. West Jersey Health Sys., 847 F.Supp. 1232, 1242 (D.N.J.1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Storie
See, e.g., Pahlavi v. Ansari (In re Ansari), 113 F.3d 17, 20 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 118 S.Ct. 298 , 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (1997); Otto v. Niles (In re Niles), 106 F.3d 1456, 1460 (9th Cir.1997); Lewis v. Scott (In re Lewis), 97 F.3d 1182, 1186 (9th Cir.1996); Quaif v. Johnson, 4 F.3d 950 , 955 (11th Cir.1993); San Saba Pecan, Inc. v. Failing (In re Failing), 124 B.R. 340, 344 (W.D.Okla.1989); Semilof v. Waskew (In re Waskew), 191 B.R. 34, 37 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1995); State v. Kaczynski (In re Kaczynski), 188 B.R. 770, 777 (Bankr.D.N.J.1995); Burt Bldg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peacock
v.
Great Western Mortgage Corp.
v.
Great Western Mortgage Corp.
No. 97-270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1997.
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.