green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.1 score
“distajo ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Crews v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126 , 129–30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997).
examined
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Robinson
(4×)
See Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71 , 688 A.2d 1152, 1164(Pa.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997); (William) Johnson, 668 A.2d at 106 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. KEAN-ARGOVITZ RESORTS, KEAN ARGOVITZ RESORTS-MICHIGAN, LLC
(2×)
See Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126, 129-30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Great Earth Companies, Inc., and Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Richard Simons and Kimberly Simons
(2×)
See Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126, 129-30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Barr
(2×)
See White v. State, 939 S.W.2d 887, 902 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnum v. State
(2×)
See White v. State, 939 S.W.2d 887, 894 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , *611 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997)(where counsel was not ineffective for asking movant on the record, to protect himself from future claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, if movant was satisfied with unspecified strategic decisions of counsel because counsel did not disclose confidences of movant that harmed the movant’s interests).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Gibson , 547 Pa. 71 , 688 A.2d 1152 , 1166 n. 30 (1997) (validating prosecutor's mention of co-defendant's suicide, because evidence establishing that suicide had been presented), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997). ". . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71, 105 , 688 A.2d 1152, 1169 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Swanson v. Civil Air Patrol
See Swanson v. General Servs., Admin., 110 F.3d 1180 , 1188 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 366 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. King
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71 , 91 n. 19, 688 A.2d 1152 , 1162 n. 19, cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997); Zettlemoyer, 500 Pa. at 50 n. 19, 454 A.2d at 955 n. 19. [3] Martin further claims that consolidation of the two indictments improperly injected his prior offenses, which do not fall within any of the enumerated statutory aggravating factors, into the penalty phase of the proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Gibson
See Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71 , 91 n. 19, 688 A.2d 1152 , 1162 n. 19, cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997); Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer, 500 Pa. at 50 n. 19, 454 A.2d at 955 n. 19. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Caro v. City of Dallas
See Swanson v. General Services Administration, 110 F.3d 1180, 1185 (5th Cir.) (reversing and rendering a jury verdict where the plaintiff offered no evidence connecting defendants' actions to race), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 366 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Feaster
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71 , 688 A. 2d 1152 , 1166 n. 30 (1997)(validating prosecutor's mention of co-defendant's suicide, because evidence establishing that suicide had been presented), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Stuart
See Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. Distajo, 66 F.3d 438 , 449-50 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997)(relying on Ballweg v. City of Springfield, 114 Ill.2d 107 , 102 Ill.Dec. 360 , 499 N.E.2d 1373 (1986), and Relph v. Bd. of Educ., 84 Ill.2d 436 , 50 Ill.Dec. 830 , 420 N.E.2d 147 (1981)). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cofield v. State
(2×)
“Where the pleadings consist only of bare assertions and conclusions, a motion court cannot meaningfully apply the Strickland standard for ineffective assistance of counsel.” Id. at 824; see also White v. State, 939 S.W.2d 887, 897 (Mo. banc 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997) (holding that “[a] bare allegation that certain witnesses made ‘pri- or inconsistent’ statements without stating what was said and how it conflicted with what was testified .to at trial is a conclusion, not a fact”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Pieper v. American Arbitration Association, Inc. R. Jeffrey Pollock Gerald Hambly
(2×)
See, e.g., Brown & Root, Inc. v. Breckenridge, 211 F.3d 194, 199 (4th Cir.2000) (stating that “[i]t cannot be the meaning of Rooker-Feldman that, while the inferior federal courts are barred from reviewing final decisions of state courts, they are free to review interlocutory orders”) (quoting Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126, 138 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997)); see also Campbell v. Greisberger, 80 F.3d 703, 707 (2d Cir.1996); Port Auth.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Rice
(4×)
See 500 Pa. 16 , 454 A.2d 937 , 942 n. 3 (1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 970 , 103 S.Ct. 2444 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1327 (1983); see also Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71 , 688 A.2d 1152 , 1160 n. 13 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997). [7] The trial court did not bar Appellant from testifying during the sentencing hearing as to his impairment during the night of the murders.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. G&t Terminal Packaging Co., Inc., Mr. Sprout, Inc., Chain Trucking, Inc., Tray Wrap, Inc., and Slow Pack, Inc.
(2×)
See id. (citing, inter alia, Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Bd., 417 U.S. 249 , 259 n. 5, 94 S.Ct. 2236 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974); Southport Petroleum Co. v. NLRB, 315 U.S. 100, 106 , 62 S.Ct. 452 , 86 L.Ed. 718 (1942)); see also Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. Distajo, 66 F.3d 438 , 453 (2d Cir.1995) (explaining that where one company is an alter ego of another, “the acts of one are the acts of all” (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 948 , 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997); NYP Acquisition Corp. and its alter ego NYP Holdings, Inc., 332 N.L.R.B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Breakiron
(2×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gibson, 547 Pa. 71 , 688 A.2d 1152 (1997), cert. denied, ____ U.S. ____, 118 S.Ct. 364 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997); [5] Commonwealth v. Martin, 465 Pa. 134 , 348 A.2d 391 (1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 923 , 96 S.Ct. 3234 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1226 (1976). [6] 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Uhc Management Company, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Sciences Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Uhc Management Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Uhc Management Company, Inc. v. Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Sciences Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Uhc Management Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation
See, e.g., Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997) (federal courts are not required to apply state law "unless it is clear that the parties intended state arbitration law to apply on a particular issue"); Belco Petroleum, 88 F.3d at 134-35 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UHC Management Co. v. Computer Sciences Corp.
See, e.g., Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997) (federal courts are not required to apply state law “unless it is clear that the parties intended state arbitration law to apply on a particular issue”); Belco Petroleum, 88 F.3d at 134-35 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Northern Telecom Ltd. Securities Litigation
See also Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. Distajo, 107 F.3d 126, 131 (2d Cir.), cert. de nied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 365 , 139 L.Ed.2d 284 (1997); DiLaura v. Power Auth. of New York, 982 F.2d 73, 76 (2d Cir.1992); In re PCH Assocs., 949 F.2d 585 , 592 (2d Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
East Columbia Basin Irrigation District
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-2054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.