green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Ozkaynak
Moreover, "[m]ore than a cooperation agreement is required to make an informant a government agent with regard to a particular defendant " ( United States v Whitten , 610 F3d 168, 193 [2d Cir 2010] [emphasis added]; see United States v Birbal , 113 F3d 342, 346 [2d Cir 1997], cert denied 522 US 976 [1997]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Ozkaynak
Moreover, "[m]ore than a cooperation agreement is required to make an informant a government agent with regard to a particular defendant " ( United States v Whitten , 610 F3d 168, 193 [2d Cir 2010] [emphasis added]; see United States v Birbal , 113 F3d 342, 346 [2d Cir 1997], cert denied 522 US 976 [1997]).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Grap
See United States v. Robinson, 110 F.3d 1320, 1324 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 975 , 118 S.Ct. 432 , 139 L.Ed.2d 331 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hess
(2×)
See United States v. Fields, 113 F.3d 313, 317-21 (2d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S.Ct. 434 , 139 L.Ed.2d 334 (1997) (guest who prepared cocaine in the householder’s young son’s bedroom with her permission; could and did bring guests to the residence, with whom he drank beer and watched television; possessed a key; had used the premises 40 to 50 times; and could come and go even in the householder’s absence had a legitimate expectation of privacy, even though he did not spend the night there, citing Olson)-, United States v. Gamez-Orduno, 235 F.3d 453 , 459 n. 8 (9th Cir.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Jerome Glover
See United States v. Chatman, 119 F.3d 1335, 1342 (8th Cir.) (affirming district court’s denial of 3-level decrease because, despite ongoing plea negotiations and defendant’s stated intention prior to trial to plead guilty, defendant did not in fact plead guilty until trial date and government had essentially completed its preparations for trial), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S.Ct. 434 , 139 L.Ed.2d 333 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Jacobs
See United States v. Chatman, 119 F.3d 1335, 1342 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Harmon, Jr., and Roger C. Walls
See United States v. Chatman, 119 F.3d 1335, 1341 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S.Ct. 434 , 139 L.Ed.2d 333 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ashby
See, e.g., United States v. Birbal, 113 F.3d 342, 346 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S. Ct. 433 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacques
Ed. 2d 619 (1980) ; see also **288 United States v. Fields , 113 F.3d 313 , 320 (2d Cir.) ("a defendant's property or possessory interest in the place searched is a factor generally considered in determining the reasonableness of a defendant's expectation of privacy"), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S. Ct. 434 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacques
Ed. 2d 619 (1980); see also United States v. Fields, 113 F.3d 313, 320 (2d Cir.) (‘‘a defendant’s prop- erty or possessory interest in the place searched is a factor generally considered in determining the reason- ableness of a defendant’s expectation of privacy’’), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S. Ct. 434 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tabone
(2×)
United States v. Triestman, 178 F.3d 624, 631 (2d Cir. 1999); see, e.g., United States v. Alton, 120 F.3d 114, 116 (8th Cir. 1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S. Ct. 433 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carroll v. State
See United States v. Espinoza, 105 F.Supp.2d 1015, 1019-21 (E.D.Wis.2000)("... the government’s position that the inevitable discoveiy doctrine trumps the exclusionary rule in cases of knock and announce violations must be rejected .... ”); see also United States v. Shugart, 889 F.Supp. 963, 976-77 (E.D.Tex.1995), aff'd, 117 F.3d 838 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 976 , 118 S.Ct. 433 , 139 L.Ed.2d 333 (". .. it must be noted that application of the inevitable discovery doctrine to evidence seized after a clear violation of the [federal] ‘knock and announce' statute would complete…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. De La Paz
Compare, e.g., Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83, 85-91 , 119 S.Ct. 469, 471-74 , 142 L.Ed. 2d 373, 377-81 (1998) (holding that transient guests present for the sole purpose of repackaging cocaine had no legitimate expectation of privacy in host's apartment, and thus no Fourth Amendment "standing" to challenge officer's observation through gap in closed blinds of ground-floor window, regardless of whether it constituted a "search"), with Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 98-100 , 110 S.Ct. 1684, 1688-90 , 109 L.Ed. 2d 85, 94-96 (1990) (holding that overnight guest suspected as robbery/murder acc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derrick Vincent Redd
See United States v. Jones, 907 F.2d 456, 460 (4th Cir.1990) (eyewitness testimony that gun used in robbery sufficient to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt on firearms charge); see also United States v. Jones, 16 F.3d 487, 490 (2d Cir.1994) (eyewitness testimony sufficient for government to meet burden of proof on firearms charge even though gun not recovered “so long as it provides a rational basis for the jury to find that the object observed by eyewitnesses was, in fact, a firearm.”) (quotations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 432 , 139 L.Ed.2d 332 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Juvenile No. 4
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-6366.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1997.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.