green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Quarterman
See Hogue v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 466, 487 (5th Cir.1997)(holding the Texas contemporaneous objection rule was already well established 35 years ago and recognized as an adequate state procedural barrier to federal habeas review at least twenty years ago), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 118 S.Ct. 1297 , 140 L.Ed.2d 334 (1998); Rogers v. Scott, 70 F.3d 340, 342 (5th Cir.1995) (recognizing the Texas contemporaneous objection rule foreclosed federal habeas review), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1235 , 116 S.Ct. 1881 , 135 L.Ed.2d 176 (1996); Amos v. Scott, 61 F.3d at 343-44 (holding Texas appellate courts c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Watts v. Quarterman
See Hogue v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 466, 487 (5th Cir.1997) (holding the Texas contemporaneous objection rule was already well established 35 years ago and recognized as an ade *806 quate state procedural barrier to federal habeas review at least twenty years ago), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 118 S.Ct. 1297 , 140 L.Ed.2d 334 (1998); Rogers v. Scott, 70 F.3d at 342 (recognizing the Texas contemporaneous objection rule foreclosed federal habeas review); Amos v. Scott, 61 F.3d at 343-44 (holding Texas appellate courts consistently apply the contemporaneous objection rule in the vast majority of case…
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Hogue v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 466, 487 (5th Cir. *528 1997) (holding the Texas contemporaneous objection rule was already well established 35 years ago and recognized as an adequate state procedural barrier to federal habeas review at least twenty years ago), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 118 S.Ct. 1297 , 140 L.Ed.2d 334 (1998); Rogers v. Scott, 70 F.3d at 342 (recognizing the Texas contemporaneous objection rule foreclosed federal habeas review); Amos v. Scott, 61 F.3d at 343-44 (holding Texas appellate courts consistently apply the contemporaneous objection rule in the vast majority of case…
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Dretke
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Woods v. Johnson, 75 F.3d 1017 , 1029 n.16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 854 (1996); see Hogue v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 466, 505 (5th Cir. 1997) (holding federal court should not consider affidavits not presented to state court), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Turner v. State
See Jones v. State, 701 So.2d 76, 79 (Fla. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 118 S.Ct. 1297 , 140 L.Ed.2d 335 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rupert v. Johnson
See Corwin v. Johnson, 150 F.3d 467, 471 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 119 S.Ct. 613 , 142 L.Ed.2d 548 (1998), (holding that the AEDPA applies to all federal habeas corpus petitions filed after the effective date of that enactment, i.e., April 24, 1996); Hogue v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 466 , 469 n. 1 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 118 S.Ct. 1297 , 140 L.Ed.2d 334 (1998); Carter v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 452, 457 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1099 , 118 S.Ct. 1567 , 140 L.Ed.2d 801 (1998); and Nobles v. Johnson, 127 F.3d at 413-15 , (holding that a federal habeas p…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rupert v. Johnson
See Hogue v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 466 , 469 n. 1 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1014 , 118 S.Ct. 1297 , 140 L.Ed.2d 334 (1998); Carter v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 452, 457 (5th Cir.1997), ce rt. pending; and Nobles v. Johnson, 127 F.3d at 413-15, (holding that a federal habeas petition filed after the effective date of the AEDPA was governed by the standard of review set forth in the AEDPA despite the fact that petitioner had filed other motions in that cause prior to April 24, 1996). 14 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hogue
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 97-8156 (A-665).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 11, 1998.
Application, Execution, Grant, Stay, Stevens.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.