green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Licudine v. Winter
See Valmonte v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 136 F.3d 914, 920 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 556 , 142 L.Ed.2d 463 (1998); Lacap, 138 F.3d at 519 (adopting the “result and reasoning of the court in Rabang ” and noting the Second Circuit’s ruling in Valmonte); Ra-bang, 35 F.3d at 1452.
discussed
Cited "see"
Licudine v. Winter
See Valmonte v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 136 F.3d 914, 920 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 (1998); Lacap, 138 F.3d at 519 (adopting the “result and reasoning of the court in Rabang” and noting the Second Circuit’s ruling in Valmonte); Rabang, 35 F.3d at 1452.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sternberg
See Lopez v. Douglas, 141 F.3d 974, 975 (10th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 556 , 142 L.Ed.2d 462 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Washington
See Lopez v. Douglas, 141 F.3d 974, 975 (10th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 556 , 142 L.Ed.2d 462 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Washington
(2×)
See Lopez v. Douglas, 141 F.3d 974, 975 (10th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chadwick v. Graves
Williams v. Hopkins, 130 F.3d 333, 336 (8th Cir.) (where the petitioner’s action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was construed as the functional equivalent of a successive habeas action, but the leave required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(3)(A) had not been requested or obtained, the district court correctly concluded that it did not have jurisdiction over the action), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1010 , 118 S.Ct. 595 , 139 L.Ed.2d 431 (1997); accord Lopez v. Douglas, 141 F.3d 974, 975-76 (10th Cir.) (where the petitioner failed to obtain the authorization required under § 2244(b)(3)(A), “the distric…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Duncan
See also, e.g., Sellers v. Ward, 135 F.3d 1333, 1339 (10th Cir.1998) ("[BJecause the constitutional error he raises focuses only on the State’s post-conviction remedy and not the judgment which provides the basis for his incarceration, it states no cognizable federal habeas claim."), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 557 , 142 L.Ed.2d 463 (1998); Roberts v. Champion, 131 F.3d 152 (table), 1997 WL 741166 at *3 (10th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1127 , 118 S.Ct. 1814 , 140 L.Ed.2d 952 (1998); Jackson v. Duckworth, 112 F.3d 878, 880 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 955 , 118 S.Ct.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frazier v. State
See also George v. State, 717 So.2d 849 (Ala.Cr.App. 1997), aff'd, 717 So.2d 858 (Ala.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1024 , 119 S.Ct. 556 , 142 L.Ed.2d 462 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Prince George's County Public Schools
v.
Prince George's County Public Schools
No. 98-6245.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1998.
525 U.S. 1024
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.