green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Speech v. Jackley
But cf. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Paradise , 138 F.3d 1183 , 1185 (7th Cir.) (finding no well-founded fear to support standing where present state attorney general, and every past attorney general since 1976, had adhered to same interpretation of statute), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 873 , 119 S.Ct. 172 , 142 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Vermont Right To Life Committee, Inc. v. Sorrell
But cf. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Paradise, 138 F.3d 1183, 1185 (7th Cir.) (finding no well-founded fear to support standing where present state attorney general, and every past attorney general since 1976, had adhered to same interpretation of statute), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 873 (1998).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Vermont Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Sorrell
But cf. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Paradise, 138 F.3d 1183, 1185 (7th Cir.) (finding no well-founded fear to support standing where present state attorney general, and every past attorney general since 1976, had adhered to same interpretation of statute), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 873 , 119 S.Ct. 172 , 142 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Augustine
See Matter of a Grand Jury Investigation, 427 Mass. 221, 225 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 873 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Montoya v. Garcia (In Re Garcia)
See Taylor v. Rupp (In re Taylor), 133 F.3d 1336, 1341 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, Rupp v. Taylor, 525 U.S. 873 , 119 S.Ct. 172 , 142 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998) (Utah law governed whether resulting or constructive trust should be imposed); United States Department of Energy v. Seneca Oil Company (In re Seneca Oil Company), 906 F.2d 1445, 1450 (10th Cir.1990) (Oklahoma law governed conditions for imposing a constructive trust).
discussed
Cited "see"
Montesano v. Xerox Corp. Retirement Income Guarantee Plan
See Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. Ratcliff, 141 F.3d 1405, 1412 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 873 , 119 S.Ct. 173 , 142 L.Ed.2d 141 (1998) (holding that the term “eligible” can only be logically construed as covering just a sub-group of employees because it would be superfluous if it were read to include all common law employees); Trombetta, 102 F.3d at 1439 (noting that a determination that an employee is a common law employee is not dispositive because employers are free to exclude classes of employees from ERISA plans).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
(2×)
However, in those cases, plaintiffs must "alleget ] an actual and well-founded fear that the law will be enforced against them" in order to assuage the troubling aspects of "the preenforcement nature of [such] suits." Id; see also Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Paradise, 138 F.3d 1183, 1185 (7th Cir.1998) (Easterbrook, J.) (observing that if a group's concern that a law will be enforced is not wellfounded, "Article III of the Constitution precludes a federal court from ruling."), cert, denied, 525 U.S. 873 , 119 S.Ct. 172 , 142 L.Ed.2d 140 (1998); Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Kurtz, 600…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A. R.
v.
Massachusetts
v.
Massachusetts
No. 98-114.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
525 U.S. 873
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.