Jewell v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 528 U.S. 1062 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Jewell v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 528 U.S. 1062 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Hoyts Cinemas Corp. (ca1, 2004-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Hoyts Cinemas Corp.
1st Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rogan v. Menino, 175 F.3d 75, 80-81 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1062 , 120 S.Ct. 616 , 145 L.Ed.2d 511 (1999); Berkovitz v. Home Box Office, Inc., 89 F.3d 24, 31 (1st Cir.1996).
discussed Cited "see" Viengsamon Pharakhone v. Nissan North America, Inc., and Rodney Baggett
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
And an employer need not reinstate an employee if application of “a uniformly-applied policy governing outside or supplemental employ ment” — i.e., a rule against working while on leave — results in the employee’s discharge. 29 C.F.R. § 825.312 (h); see Sepe v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 176 F.3d 1113, 1115-16 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1062 , 120 S.Ct. 616 , 145 L.Ed.2d 510 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Norwalk Medical Group, P.C. v. Yee
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Circle Industries USA, Inc. v. Parke Construction Group, Inc., 183 F.3d 105, 109 (2d Cir.) (violation of AAA rules can, under certain circumstances, require vacatur of arbitration award, but party seeking vacatur bears heavy burden of establishing sufficient grounds), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1062 , 120 S. Ct. 616 , 145 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd.
1st Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Athridge v. Rivas, 141 F.3d 357 (D.C.Cir.1998); see also Rogan v. Menino, 175 F.3d 75, 79 (1st Cir.) (discussing a Rule 10(c) statement approved by a district court judge that *349 recited what had been said at an unrecorded chambers conference), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1062 , 120 S.Ct. 616 , 145 L.Ed.2d 511 (1999); Barilaro v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 876 F.2d 260, 263 (1st Cir.1989) (suggesting that appellant should have utilized Rule 10(c) to memorialize what had occurred at a pretrial conference).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jewell
v.
Dallas Independent School District
No. 99-625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 1999.
528 U.S. 1062
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.