green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
J. Thomas Zaber, On Behalf Of Himself And All Others Similarly Situated Vs. City Of Dubuque, Iowa
See Thomas v. Network Solutions, Inc., 176 F.3d 500 (D.C.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 934 , 145 L.Ed.2d 813 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Reeder v. City of Paris
See Steadman v. Texas Rangers, 179 F.3d 360, 366 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 933 , 144 L.Ed.2d 812 (2000); Douglass v. United Servs.
discussed
Cited "see"
National A-1 Advertising, Inc. v. Network Solutions, Inc.
See Thomas v. Network Solutions, Inc., 176 F.3d 500, 511 (D.C.Cir.1999) (“A recent and novel function such as domain name registration hardly strikes us as a ‘quintessential’ government service.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 934 , 145 L.Ed.2d 813 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sonia v. Rainer
“The notion of punishment, as we 8 commonly understand it, cuts across the division between the civil and the criminal 9 law....” United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 447–48 (1989); see also Louis v. 10 Commissioner, 170 F.3d 1232, 1236 (9th Cir.1999) (“Even a civil sanction may be 11 punitive for Eighth Amendment purposes.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 (2000). 12 Two questions are pertinent when determining whether the Excessive Fines 13 Clause has been violated: (1) Is the statutory provision a fine, i.e., does it impose 14 punishment? and (2) If so, is the fine excessive?
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Pursuant to this amendment, “Congress may not assume control over the legislative processes of the states by directly compelling them to enact and enforce a federal regulatory program.” New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 157 (1992); State v. United States, 106 F.3d 661, 665-66 (5th Cir. 1997); see also City ofNew York v. United States, 179 F.3d 29’33 (2d Cir. 1999)’ cert. denied 528 U.S. 1115 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Daley
I recognize that three courts of appeals have upheld the § 1997(e) limits on attorney fee awards, see Hadix v. Johnson, 230 F.3d 840 (6th Cir.2000); Boivin v. Black, 225 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2000); Madrid v. Gomez, 190 F.3d 990 (9th Cir.1999); see also Collins v. Montgomery County Board of Prison Inspectors, 176 F.3d 679, 686 (3d Cir.1999), 1 cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000) (en banc panel divided equally on constitutionality of provision limiting fees to 150% of judgment), and that federal statutes carry a presumption of constitutionality not easily overcome.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Nunez
v.
Nunez
No. 99-251.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2000.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.