Koenick v. Felton, 528 U.S. 1118 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Koenick v. Felton, 528 U.S. 1118 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “For tort claims, Maryland adheres to the First Restatement of Conflict of Laws rule, lex loci delicti commissi, or the law of the place of the harm, to determine the applicable substantive law.”
35 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Havard v. Perdue Farms, Inc. (mdd, 2005-12-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Havard v. Perdue Farms, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
for tort claims, maryland adheres to the first restatement of conflict of laws rule, lex loci delicti commissi, or the law of the place of the harm, to determine the applicable substantive law.
cited Cited "see" Galustian v. Peter
E.D. Va. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Galustian I, 561 F.Supp.2d at 566 n. 10 (citing Wells v. Biddy, 186 F.3d 505, 527-28 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1118 , 120 S.Ct. 939 , 145 L.Ed.2d 817 (2000)).
cited Cited "see" Galustian v. Peter
E.D. Va. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wells v. Liddy, 186 F.3d 505, 527-28 (4th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1118 , 120 S.Ct. 939 , 145 L.Ed.2d 817 (2000). 11 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Omisore
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ward, 190 F.3d 483, 492 (6th Cir.1999) (failure of defendant to object to factual findings of presentence report waives any future ob jections), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1118 , 120 S.Ct. 940 , 145 L.Ed.2d 817 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Seck
S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ward, 190 F.3d 483, 491 (6th Cir.1999) (“We think Wallach does not apply here, because in that case the perjured testimony was not brought to the attention of the jury, whereas here, the court gave the defendants several opportunities to cross-examine and recross-examine the witnesses to bring any inconsistencies in testimony to the attention of the jury.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1118 , 120 S.Ct. 940 , 145 L.Ed.2d 817 (2000).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Slusher
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ward, 190 F.3d 483, 488 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1118 , 120 S.Ct. 940 , 145 L.Ed.2d 817 and 529 U.S. 1028 , 120 S.Ct. 1440 , 146 L.Ed.2d 328 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Koenick
v.
Felton
No. 99-816.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2000.
528 U.S. 1118
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.