green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Limited
State v. Nash
(2×)
With respect to the trial court’s reliance on testimony that suspects trafficking in narcotics often work with others who are in the immediate vicinity, courts have recognized that, “[a]Iso relevant [to the totality matrix] are those inferences and deductions made by officers under the particular circumstances, since law enforcement officials are trained to cull significance from behavior that would appear innocent to the untrained observer.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Bailey, 417 F.3d 873, 877 (8th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Orozco, 191 F.3d 578, 581…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vela
(2×)
See United States v. Orozco, 191 F.3d 578, 581 (5th Cir.1999). cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1144 , 120 S.Ct. 996 , 145 L.Ed.2d 943 (2000)(quoting United States v. Jones, 149 F.3d 364, 368 (5th Cir.1998)); see also Morales, 191 F.3d at 605 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Diaz
(2×)
See U.S. v. Gonzalez, 183 F.3d 1315 , 1325-26 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1144 , 120 S.Ct. 996 , 145 L.Ed.2d 943 (2000) (stating both statutory and guideline increases may be imposed if defendant and accomplice used different weapons as part of joint undertaking); U.S. v. Willett, 90 F.3d 404, 407-08 (9th Cir.1996) (finding no double counting in applying both increases for separate weapons possessed by defendant).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zapata-Ibarra
See United States v. Orozco, 191 F.3d 578, 581 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 996 , 145 L.Ed.2d 943 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zapata-Ibarra
See United States v. Orozco, 191 F.3d 576, 581 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. 996 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gonzalez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-7543.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 2000.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.